Abstract 4359042: Cancer Patients With Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification Receive Less Preventive Cardiovascular Care: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Introduction: Incidental coronary artery calcification (CAC) frequently appears on routine chest CT scans and indicates high risk for future atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, presenting an opportunity for prevention. In patients with active or recent cancer diagnosis, such incidental findings may be overlooked or inadequately managed. Evaluating how the incidental CAC finding influences clinical management could provide critical insight into integrative cardiovascular care in oncology populations. We aimed to evaluate whether cancer patients with incidental CAC receive comparable cardiovascular preventive interventions as non-cancer counterparts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-75 years at UCONN Health who had incidental CAC identified on routine non-gated chest CT between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with an active or recent cancer diagnosis (n=99) and those without cancer (n=698). After 1:1 propensity score matching on demographic and baseline comorbidities, 99 matched pairs were analyzed. Patients with known pre-existing cardiovascular disease or prior coronary interventions were excluded. Socioeconomic factors were estimated based on ZIP code. Primary outcomes included initiation of statin or aspirin therapy, cardiology referral, stress testing within one year, and all-cause mortality. Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests. Results: After matching, cancer patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to non-cancer controls (20.2% vs. 10.1%, p=0.046). Cardiovascular preventive interventions were significantly less common in cancer patients: statin initiation (40.4% vs. 60.6%, p=0.007), aspirin initiation (21.2% vs. 36.4%, p=0.028), stress testing within one year (0% vs. 9.1%, p=0.006), and cardiology referral within one year (9.1% vs. 26.3%, p=0.003). Conclusions: In this matched cohort study, cancer patients with incidental CAC were significantly less likely to receive preventative cardiovascular interventions and had higher all-cause mortality compared to non-cancer controls. These findings highlight a missed opportunity for cardio-preventive care in oncology populations and support routine integration of cardio-oncology pathways to address incidental CAC in cancer patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4359042
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4359042: Cancer Patients With Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification Receive Less Preventive Cardiovascular Care: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Margaret K. Callahan, Hossam Albeyoumi Mohammed, Donna Comins Pike, Samer Habeel et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4359042: Cancer Patients With Incidental Coronary Artery Calcification Receive Less Preventive Cardiovascular Care: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study

Margaret K. Callahan, Hossam Albeyoumi Mohammed, Donna Comins Pike, Samer Habeel, Min Jung Kim, Agnes Kim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Incidental coronary artery calcification (CAC) frequently appears on routine chest CT scans and indicates high risk for future atherosclerotic cardiovascular events, presenting an opportunity for prevention. In patients with active or recent cancer diagnosis, such incidental findings may be overlooked or inadequately managed. Evaluating how the incidental CAC finding influences clinical management could provide critical insight into integrative cardiovascular care in oncology populations. We aimed to evaluate whether cancer patients with incidental CAC receive comparable cardiovascular preventive interventions as non-cancer counterparts. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-75 years at UCONN Health who had incidental CAC identified on routine non-gated chest CT between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with an active or recent cancer diagnosis (n=99) and those without cancer (n=698). After 1:1 propensity score matching on demographic and baseline comorbidities, 99 matched pairs were analyzed. Patients with known pre-existing cardiovascular disease or prior coronary interventions were excluded. Socioeconomic factors were estimated based on ZIP code. Primary outcomes included initiation of statin or aspirin therapy, cardiology referral, stress testing within one year, and all-cause mortality. Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests. Results: After matching, cancer patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to non-cancer controls (20.2% vs. 10.1%, p=0.046). Cardiovascular preventive interventions were significantly less common in cancer patients: statin initiation (40.4% vs. 60.6%, p=0.007), aspirin initiation (21.2% vs. 36.4%, p=0.028), stress testing within one year (0% vs. 9.1%, p=0.006), and cardiology referral within one year (9.1% vs. 26.3%, p=0.003). Conclusions: In this matched cohort study, cancer patients with incidental CAC were significantly less likely to receive preventative cardiovascular interventions and had higher all-cause mortality compared to non-cancer controls. These findings highlight a missed opportunity for cardio-preventive care in oncology populations and support routine integration of cardio-oncology pathways to address incidental CAC in cancer patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Connecticut (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.