Abstract 4372001: Hospital performance can overcome the impact of socioeconomic distress on failure to rescue in cardiac surgery

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), or death after a surgical complication, is an important indicator of surgical quality and outcomes. The likelihood of FTR is closely associated with the hospital in which surgery took place, even when accounting for patient-specific characteristics. As a result, FTR is considered a primary driving factor explaining differences in postoperative surgical mortality between institutions 1 suggesting that FTR may be a function of different hospital processes of care. It's been shown that socioeconomic distress, as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI), is in fact associated with FTR in cardiac surgery. 2 Research Question: The study objective was to examine the association between DCI and FTR in a diverse, multi-institutional cardiac surgical network. Methods: A total of 40,661 patients undergoing one of the seven index cardiac surgical operations across 12 affiliate institutions from 2012-2019 were included. Of these patients, 5,229 experienced at least one of the following complications: prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure, or unplanned reoperation. The primary outcome was FTR, defined as operative mortality in patients experiencing one of these complications. Socioeconomic distress was determined using the DCI score (0-100) by zip codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic models assessed the association of DCI with FTR while adjusting for patient risk using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-PROM score with hospital as a random effect. Results: Patients from the most socioeconomically distressed communities had higher unadjusted rates of complications (16.2% vs. 10.8%, p<0.001) and FTR (19.6% vs. 14.5%, p=0.0167) compared to those from the least distressed communities ( Figure 1) . However, after adjusting for STS-PROM, patient DCI was not significantly associated with FTR. Additionally, hospital neighborhood socioeconomic distress was not correlated with hospital-level FTR rates ( Figure 2) . Notably, patients treated at hospitals in the highest DCI neighborhoods had lower risk-adjusted FTR rates compared to those treated in hospitals in more affluent areas ( Figure 3) . Conclusions: In this multi-institutional study, socioeconomic distress was associated with higher unadjusted FTR rates but not with risk-adjusted FTR. Moreover, hospitals in more distressed neighborhoods demonstrated lower FTR rates, underscoring the importance of hospital processes of care in mitigating socioeconomic disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4372001
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4372001: Hospital performance can overcome the impact of socioeconomic distress on failure to rescue in cardiac surgery

Gabriela O. Escalante, Rachel Logan, Christine Yang, Paul Kurlansky et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4372001: Hospital performance can overcome the impact of socioeconomic distress on failure to rescue in cardiac surgery

Gabriela O. Escalante, Rachel Logan, Christine Yang, Paul Kurlansky, Michael Argenziano, Emily Guderian, Chunhui Wang
article en

Abstract

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR), or death after a surgical complication, is an important indicator of surgical quality and outcomes. The likelihood of FTR is closely associated with the hospital in which surgery took place, even when accounting for patient-specific characteristics. As a result, FTR is considered a primary driving factor explaining differences in postoperative surgical mortality between institutions 1 suggesting that FTR may be a function of different hospital processes of care. It's been shown that socioeconomic distress, as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI), is in fact associated with FTR in cardiac surgery. 2 Research Question: The study objective was to examine the association between DCI and FTR in a diverse, multi-institutional cardiac surgical network. Methods: A total of 40,661 patients undergoing one of the seven index cardiac surgical operations across 12 affiliate institutions from 2012-2019 were included. Of these patients, 5,229 experienced at least one of the following complications: prolonged ventilation, stroke, renal failure, or unplanned reoperation. The primary outcome was FTR, defined as operative mortality in patients experiencing one of these complications. Socioeconomic distress was determined using the DCI score (0-100) by zip codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic models assessed the association of DCI with FTR while adjusting for patient risk using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)-PROM score with hospital as a random effect. Results: Patients from the most socioeconomically distressed communities had higher unadjusted rates of complications (16.2% vs. 10.8%, p<0.001) and FTR (19.6% vs. 14.5%, p=0.0167) compared to those from the least distressed communities ( Figure 1) . However, after adjusting for STS-PROM, patient DCI was not significantly associated with FTR. Additionally, hospital neighborhood socioeconomic distress was not correlated with hospital-level FTR rates ( Figure 2) . Notably, patients treated at hospitals in the highest DCI neighborhoods had lower risk-adjusted FTR rates compared to those treated in hospitals in more affluent areas ( Figure 3) . Conclusions: In this multi-institutional study, socioeconomic distress was associated with higher unadjusted FTR rates but not with risk-adjusted FTR. Moreover, hospitals in more distressed neighborhoods demonstrated lower FTR rates, underscoring the importance of hospital processes of care in mitigating socioeconomic disparities.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.