Abstract 4362660: Evaluating The Incidence And Risk Factors Of Ischemic Stroke After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly used to reduce thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation. Despite procedural success, ischemic strokes still occur post-LAAC. Understanding contributing risk factors remains critical to improving patient outcomes. Objectives: To assess the incidence of ischemic stroke following LAAC and evaluate associated risk factors, including device-related thrombus (DRT), peri-device leak (PDL > 5 mm), patient-level factors such as the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and post-procedural anticoagulation strategies. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies between January 2015 and May 2025. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting stroke outcomes after LAAC were included. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to pool odds ratios (ORs) for stroke associated with risk factors. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using I 2 statistics and funnel plots. Results: Nineteen studies comprising 14,982 patients were included. The pooled incidence of ischemic stroke post-LAAC was 2.4% (range: 0.5%–4.4%) over a mean follow-up of 18 months. DRT was significantly associated with increased stroke risk (OR 5.08; 95% CI 3.47–7.44), as was peri-device leak (PDL) (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.06–2.52). Patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores ≥4 had higher stroke rates (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2–2.5), and those with reduced LVEF (<50%) were also at increased risk (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). Although post-procedural anticoagulation regimens varied across studies, extended anticoagulation appeared to offer protective benefits in selected populations. Conclusion: Ischemic stroke can still occur after successful deployment of the LAAC device. DRT and PDL are strong predictors of stroke, which warrant continued anticoagulation. Patient-level factors, such as elevated CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores and reduced LVEF, are at risk of stroke after LAAC. Individualized anticoagulation and antiplatelet strategies, as well as routine post-procedure imaging, may continue to be used to mitigate these risks and improve long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362660
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362660: Evaluating The Incidence And Risk Factors Of Ischemic Stroke After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Darshan Gandhi, Ajitha Ganesan, Gaurav Patel, Warren Fernandes et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4362660: Evaluating The Incidence And Risk Factors Of Ischemic Stroke After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Darshan Gandhi, Ajitha Ganesan, Gaurav Patel, Warren Fernandes, Sulochana Gnanasekaran, Atul Prakash, INBAN PUGAZHENDI, Kaushal Patel
article en

Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly used to reduce thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation. Despite procedural success, ischemic strokes still occur post-LAAC. Understanding contributing risk factors remains critical to improving patient outcomes. Objectives: To assess the incidence of ischemic stroke following LAAC and evaluate associated risk factors, including device-related thrombus (DRT), peri-device leak (PDL > 5 mm), patient-level factors such as the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and post-procedural anticoagulation strategies. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for studies between January 2015 and May 2025. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting stroke outcomes after LAAC were included. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to pool odds ratios (ORs) for stroke associated with risk factors. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using I 2 statistics and funnel plots. Results: Nineteen studies comprising 14,982 patients were included. The pooled incidence of ischemic stroke post-LAAC was 2.4% (range: 0.5%–4.4%) over a mean follow-up of 18 months. DRT was significantly associated with increased stroke risk (OR 5.08; 95% CI 3.47–7.44), as was peri-device leak (PDL) (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.06–2.52). Patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores ≥4 had higher stroke rates (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2–2.5), and those with reduced LVEF (<50%) were also at increased risk (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4). Although post-procedural anticoagulation regimens varied across studies, extended anticoagulation appeared to offer protective benefits in selected populations. Conclusion: Ischemic stroke can still occur after successful deployment of the LAAC device. DRT and PDL are strong predictors of stroke, which warrant continued anticoagulation. Patient-level factors, such as elevated CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores and reduced LVEF, are at risk of stroke after LAAC. Individualized anticoagulation and antiplatelet strategies, as well as routine post-procedure imaging, may continue to be used to mitigate these risks and improve long-term outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Saint Vincent Hospital (US), St. Mary's Hospital (US), Thomas Cole Historic House (US), Saint Michael's Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.