Abstract 4366209: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs Anticoagulation Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Outcomes Study

Background: Anticoagulation remains the standard of care following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative stroke prevention strategy in this context is not well established. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing LAAO within 3 months after AF ablation versus those receiving long-term anticoagulation following AF ablation in a large, real-world cohort. Methods: We queried the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network, comprising de-identified electronic health record data from over 60 health systems. Using data from 2010-2025, we conducted a propensity-matched analysis of two cohorts of adult patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and were subsequently treated with either LAAO without oral anticoagulation or oral anticoagulation alone. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on demographics and clinical comorbidities. Outcomes were assessed at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, stroke events, and major bleeding events. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and p-values. Results: After propensity matching, the two cohorts each had 2,060 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced post-matching: mean age was 71.4 ± 8.2 vs 71.4 ± 11.6 years (p=0.787), 36.8% were female in both cohorts (p=1.0), with similar rates of ischemic heart disease (51.9% vs 51.9%, p=0.975), hyperlipidemia (70.6% vs 69.5%, p=0.454), and baseline antiplatelet use (48.6% vs 48.3%, p=0.852). LAAO was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and major bleeding events at 5 years compared to oral anticoagulation alone, with no significant difference in stroke incidence among both groups. (Figures 1). Conclusion: In this large, multicenter propensity-matched cohort, LAAO following AF ablation was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and major bleeding events compared to anticoagulation. These findings suggest LAAO may offer a favorable long-term alternative for select post-ablation patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366209
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366209: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs Anticoagulation Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Outcomes Study

Tess Calcagno, Mohamed Kanj, W.H. Wilson Tang, Rochell Issa et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4366209: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs Anticoagulation Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Outcomes Study

Tess Calcagno, Mohamed Kanj, W.H. Wilson Tang, Rochell Issa, Mina K. Chung, Oussama Wazni, Faysal Massad
article en

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulation remains the standard of care following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the role of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as an alternative stroke prevention strategy in this context is not well established. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing LAAO within 3 months after AF ablation versus those receiving long-term anticoagulation following AF ablation in a large, real-world cohort. Methods: We queried the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network, comprising de-identified electronic health record data from over 60 health systems. Using data from 2010-2025, we conducted a propensity-matched analysis of two cohorts of adult patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and were subsequently treated with either LAAO without oral anticoagulation or oral anticoagulation alone. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on demographics and clinical comorbidities. Outcomes were assessed at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, stroke events, and major bleeding events. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and p-values. Results: After propensity matching, the two cohorts each had 2,060 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced post-matching: mean age was 71.4 ± 8.2 vs 71.4 ± 11.6 years (p=0.787), 36.8% were female in both cohorts (p=1.0), with similar rates of ischemic heart disease (51.9% vs 51.9%, p=0.975), hyperlipidemia (70.6% vs 69.5%, p=0.454), and baseline antiplatelet use (48.6% vs 48.3%, p=0.852). LAAO was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and major bleeding events at 5 years compared to oral anticoagulation alone, with no significant difference in stroke incidence among both groups. (Figures 1). Conclusion: In this large, multicenter propensity-matched cohort, LAAO following AF ablation was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and major bleeding events compared to anticoagulation. These findings suggest LAAO may offer a favorable long-term alternative for select post-ablation patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Gates (United States) (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.