Abstract 4366285: Donor Renal Function Should Inform Evaluation of Circulatory Death Heart Offers

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is the fastest-growing source of donor hearts in the United States, yet the impact of donor hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and severe renal dysfunction on 1-year recipient survival remains unclear. While earlier analyses in brain-dead donors suggested that hypertension, diabetes, and moderate renal impairment did not worsen short-term outcomes, these findings have not been systematically revisited in the physiologically distinct setting of DCD heart transplantation Methods: Adult (≥18 y) recipients of isolated DCD heart transplants in the UNOS registry (January 2019- April 2025; n = 2,058) were studied. Donors were stratified by HTN, DM, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); severe dysfunction was prespecified as eGFR < 45 One-year all-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Associations were tested with Kaplan–Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression, and 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper = 0.20 SD, 198 pairs). A parallel donation-after-brain-death (DBD) cohort provided context. Results: DCD activity increased steadily, accompanied by growing acceptance of donors with HTN, DM, and low eGFR ( Image 1 ). One-year survival was unchanged by HTN (88.1 % vs 88.3 %, p = 0.80) or DM (87.4 % vs 88.2 %, p = 0.67) ( Image 2 ). In contrast, recipients of grafts from donors with eGFR < 45 experienced lower survival (82.6 % vs 88.6 %, p = 0.04); this difference remained significant after 1:1 propensity matching (p = 0.009). Severe renal dysfunction was independently prognostic in multivariable analysis (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.07–3.06, p = 0.028). Across four strata defined by donor type and eGFR, excess mortality emerged only for DCD hearts with low eGFR (adjusted HR 1.87, p = 0.05), whereas renal status did not influence DBD outcomes ( Image 3 ). Conclusions: Donor HTN and DM do not compromise 1-year survival in DCD heart transplantation, supporting liberal use of such grafts. Severe donor renal dysfunction, however, nearly doubles early mortality and appears uniquely detrimental in the DCD context, potentially reflecting synergy between inflammatory priming and warm ischemia. Routine incorporation of an eGFR threshold into DCD evaluation algorithms—augmented by contemporary perfusion or regional reperfusion strategies—may enable continued expansion of the donor pool while safeguarding recipient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366285
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366285: Donor Renal Function Should Inform Evaluation of Circulatory Death Heart Offers

Alexander Berg, Elbert Heng, Jeffrey J. Teuteberg, Young Woo Do et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4366285: Donor Renal Function Should Inform Evaluation of Circulatory Death Heart Offers

Alexander Berg, Elbert Heng, Jeffrey J. Teuteberg, Young Woo Do, Aravind Krishnan, Danielle M. Mullis, Daniel Alnasir, An Vu, Alyssa Garrison, John MacArthur
article en

Abstract

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is the fastest-growing source of donor hearts in the United States, yet the impact of donor hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and severe renal dysfunction on 1-year recipient survival remains unclear. While earlier analyses in brain-dead donors suggested that hypertension, diabetes, and moderate renal impairment did not worsen short-term outcomes, these findings have not been systematically revisited in the physiologically distinct setting of DCD heart transplantation Methods: Adult (≥18 y) recipients of isolated DCD heart transplants in the UNOS registry (January 2019- April 2025; n = 2,058) were studied. Donors were stratified by HTN, DM, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); severe dysfunction was prespecified as eGFR < 45 One-year all-cause mortality was the primary endpoint. Associations were tested with Kaplan–Meier curves, multivariable Cox regression, and 1:1 propensity-score matching (caliper = 0.20 SD, 198 pairs). A parallel donation-after-brain-death (DBD) cohort provided context. Results: DCD activity increased steadily, accompanied by growing acceptance of donors with HTN, DM, and low eGFR ( Image 1 ). One-year survival was unchanged by HTN (88.1 % vs 88.3 %, p = 0.80) or DM (87.4 % vs 88.2 %, p = 0.67) ( Image 2 ). In contrast, recipients of grafts from donors with eGFR < 45 experienced lower survival (82.6 % vs 88.6 %, p = 0.04); this difference remained significant after 1:1 propensity matching (p = 0.009). Severe renal dysfunction was independently prognostic in multivariable analysis (HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.07–3.06, p = 0.028). Across four strata defined by donor type and eGFR, excess mortality emerged only for DCD hearts with low eGFR (adjusted HR 1.87, p = 0.05), whereas renal status did not influence DBD outcomes ( Image 3 ). Conclusions: Donor HTN and DM do not compromise 1-year survival in DCD heart transplantation, supporting liberal use of such grafts. Severe donor renal dysfunction, however, nearly doubles early mortality and appears uniquely detrimental in the DCD context, potentially reflecting synergy between inflammatory priming and warm ischemia. Routine incorporation of an eGFR threshold into DCD evaluation algorithms—augmented by contemporary perfusion or regional reperfusion strategies—may enable continued expansion of the donor pool while safeguarding recipient outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Palo Alto University (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.