Abstract Sun907: <i>Feasibility and Safety of AED Drone Manual Delivery in Nighttime: A Quasi-Experimental Study</i>

Background: Outdoor nighttime mass gatherings pose challenges for OHCA responses. While drone AED delivery shows promise in daytime (Jakobsen et al., 2024), this study’s major objective was to compare the feasibility (flight performance) and safety of manual AED drone deliveries (incident rates) by paramedics during daytime versus nighttime. Only one prior study (Scholz et al., 2023) evaluated automated nighttime operations, leaving manual flights understudied. Methods: (Update) A quasi-experimental within-subjects trial was conducted in Hong Kong’s High Island Reservoir (semi-urban, light-pollution-free) from January–March 2024. Twelve advanced-certified paramedic pilots (mean age 34 ± 5.2 years, 10 male, 2 female) manually operated a DJI M30T drone (3.9 kg) equipped with infrared/night vision, strobe lights, and a 480g AED across 800m during 12 daytime and 12 nighttime flights. The sample size of 12 per group followed the pilot study design recommendation (Julious, 2005) Primary outcomes were flight time (seconds) and incident rates; exposure was time-of-day (day/night). Flights followed EVLOS protocols with safety officers. Paired t-tests compared flight times; chi-square assessed incident differences. Ethical approval was obtained from Hong Kong Metropolitan University and under the approval of the Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department. Results: All 24 flights (12 pilots × 2 conditions) concluded without incidents or obstacle triggers. Mean flight times were 136 ± 8.71s (day) vs. 139 ± 14.16s (night), with an unadjusted mean difference of 3.92s (95% CI: -6.1 to 13.9; p=0.43; Cohen’s d=0.24). Incident rates did not differ (0% vs. 0%, p&gt;0.05). Paramedics Pilots reported comparable situational awareness during nighttime operations, attributing confidence to infrared navigation and strobe lighting systems. Conclusions: Manual nighttime AED drone delivery with lights is feasible and safe, with performance parity to daytime. Infrared technology and trained paramedic pilots enable scalable 24/7 deployment, potentially reducing OHCA mortality disparities. Findings directly support integrating drones into mass-gathering emergency protocols. Future full scale studies should validate findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sun907
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sun907: Feasibility and Safety of AED Drone Manual Delivery in Nighttime: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Joey Shuk Yin HO, A. W. C. Yip, Chan Chun Kit Jacky, Ling Ngai Tung et al.
Circulation
UAV Applications and Optimization
article

Abstract Sun907: Feasibility and Safety of AED Drone Manual Delivery in Nighttime: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Joey Shuk Yin HO, A. W. C. Yip, Chan Chun Kit Jacky, Ling Ngai Tung, Nicole Wai Ling CHU
article en

Abstract

Background: Outdoor nighttime mass gatherings pose challenges for OHCA responses. While drone AED delivery shows promise in daytime (Jakobsen et al., 2024), this study’s major objective was to compare the feasibility (flight performance) and safety of manual AED drone deliveries (incident rates) by paramedics during daytime versus nighttime. Only one prior study (Scholz et al., 2023) evaluated automated nighttime operations, leaving manual flights understudied. Methods: (Update) A quasi-experimental within-subjects trial was conducted in Hong Kong’s High Island Reservoir (semi-urban, light-pollution-free) from January–March 2024. Twelve advanced-certified paramedic pilots (mean age 34 ± 5.2 years, 10 male, 2 female) manually operated a DJI M30T drone (3.9 kg) equipped with infrared/night vision, strobe lights, and a 480g AED across 800m during 12 daytime and 12 nighttime flights. The sample size of 12 per group followed the pilot study design recommendation (Julious, 2005) Primary outcomes were flight time (seconds) and incident rates; exposure was time-of-day (day/night). Flights followed EVLOS protocols with safety officers. Paired t-tests compared flight times; chi-square assessed incident differences. Ethical approval was obtained from Hong Kong Metropolitan University and under the approval of the Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department. Results: All 24 flights (12 pilots × 2 conditions) concluded without incidents or obstacle triggers. Mean flight times were 136 ± 8.71s (day) vs. 139 ± 14.16s (night), with an unadjusted mean difference of 3.92s (95% CI: -6.1 to 13.9; p=0.43; Cohen’s d=0.24). Incident rates did not differ (0% vs. 0%, p&gt;0.05). Paramedics Pilots reported comparable situational awareness during nighttime operations, attributing confidence to infrared navigation and strobe lighting systems. Conclusions: Manual nighttime AED drone delivery with lights is feasible and safe, with performance parity to daytime. Infrared technology and trained paramedic pilots enable scalable 24/7 deployment, potentially reducing OHCA mortality disparities. Findings directly support integrating drones into mass-gathering emergency protocols. Future full scale studies should validate findings.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
UAV Applications and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.