Abstract 4367560: Preliminary Results from the LiLAC Study: Living Life After Cardiogenic Shock Assessing Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes Using Novel Digital Remote Monitoring Tools

Introduction: Studies on health-related quality of life (QoL) after discharge from cardiogenic shock (CS) are scarce. Patient-reported outcomes are essential to understanding long-term impacts of CS on daily functioning and resources for improving outcomes. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CS survivors experiencing worse functional limitations and psychological symptoms post-discharge and suffer higher readmission and mortality rates within 12 months. Objective: LiLAC (Living Life After Cardiogenic Shock) is a prospective study quantifying the functional, psychological, and socioeconomic impairments experienced by CS survivors over 12 months post-discharge and how these metrics inform clinical outcomes. Methods: LiLAC utilizes Eureka, a digital patient survey platform, to execute validated health-related QoL instruments including SF 20, MacArthur Ladder Scale, PROMIS, and GAD-7 completed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Clinical data describing CS severity during admission are collected in REDCap, and multivariable regression and receiver operator curves are utilized to identify impactful disease features. [SHP1] [MOU2] Results: Between December 9 th , 2024, and May 7 th , 2025, 96 [SHP3] patients were discharged from the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit after CS. 71 were eligible to participate. Of these, 46 (64%) [CO4] consented, with 32 (69%) completing baseline assessments, 13 (28%) completed the 1-month follow-up, and 9 (19%) completed the 3-month. GAD-7 scores improved from a median of 5.5 (IQR:3-12) at baseline to 4 (IQR:2-6) at 1 month. Cognitive function T-scores notably peaked at 49.2 at 1 month (PROMIS). Social functioning declined from 63.28 ± 39.14 at baseline to 42.86 ± 31.67 at 1 month and 44.44 ± 34.86 at 3 months (SF-20). Mental health scores were lowest at 1 month (21.43 ± 21.52). Seven participants self-reported heart-related readmissions at 1 month, and one at 3 months. Conclusion: Early results demonstrate measurable impairments in functional status, psychological well-being, and cognitive function among CS survivors, . While readmission rates remain low, these data highlight the heterogeneity of post-discharge recovery underscoring the value of remote, standardized QoL monitoring. Low readmission and mortality events limit statistical analysis. Longitudinal associations between patient-reported outcomes and clinical events are prospectively being assessed and will be reported in full.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367560
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367560: Preliminary Results from the LiLAC Study: Living Life After Cardiogenic Shock Assessing Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes Using Novel Digital Remote Monitoring Tools

Frederick W. Bell, Connor O’Brien, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Sarai Hernandez-Pastrana et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4367560: Preliminary Results from the LiLAC Study: Living Life After Cardiogenic Shock Assessing Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes Using Novel Digital Remote Monitoring Tools

Frederick W. Bell, Connor O’Brien, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Sarai Hernandez-Pastrana, Emily Marogi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Studies on health-related quality of life (QoL) after discharge from cardiogenic shock (CS) are scarce. Patient-reported outcomes are essential to understanding long-term impacts of CS on daily functioning and resources for improving outcomes. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that CS survivors experiencing worse functional limitations and psychological symptoms post-discharge and suffer higher readmission and mortality rates within 12 months. Objective: LiLAC (Living Life After Cardiogenic Shock) is a prospective study quantifying the functional, psychological, and socioeconomic impairments experienced by CS survivors over 12 months post-discharge and how these metrics inform clinical outcomes. Methods: LiLAC utilizes Eureka, a digital patient survey platform, to execute validated health-related QoL instruments including SF 20, MacArthur Ladder Scale, PROMIS, and GAD-7 completed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. Clinical data describing CS severity during admission are collected in REDCap, and multivariable regression and receiver operator curves are utilized to identify impactful disease features. [SHP1] [MOU2] Results: Between December 9 th , 2024, and May 7 th , 2025, 96 [SHP3] patients were discharged from the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit after CS. 71 were eligible to participate. Of these, 46 (64%) [CO4] consented, with 32 (69%) completing baseline assessments, 13 (28%) completed the 1-month follow-up, and 9 (19%) completed the 3-month. GAD-7 scores improved from a median of 5.5 (IQR:3-12) at baseline to 4 (IQR:2-6) at 1 month. Cognitive function T-scores notably peaked at 49.2 at 1 month (PROMIS). Social functioning declined from 63.28 ± 39.14 at baseline to 42.86 ± 31.67 at 1 month and 44.44 ± 34.86 at 3 months (SF-20). Mental health scores were lowest at 1 month (21.43 ± 21.52). Seven participants self-reported heart-related readmissions at 1 month, and one at 3 months. Conclusion: Early results demonstrate measurable impairments in functional status, psychological well-being, and cognitive function among CS survivors, . While readmission rates remain low, these data highlight the heterogeneity of post-discharge recovery underscoring the value of remote, standardized QoL monitoring. Low readmission and mortality events limit statistical analysis. Longitudinal associations between patient-reported outcomes and clinical events are prospectively being assessed and will be reported in full.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
City College of San Francisco (US), Aqwest (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.