Abstract 4335927: Gene positive vs. gene negative clinical and structural outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiovascular disease associated with increased risks of heart failure, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and stroke. Over 1,400 pathogenic variants, primarily in MYH7 and MYBPC3, have been identified, yet the prognostic significance of genetics remains unclear. Recent studies suggest genotype-positive (G+) HCM is linked to earlier diagnosis, greater disease severity, and poorer outcomes, necessitating further research to clarify the relationship between genotype, disease progression, and clinical management. Objectives: 1. Examine the association between genetic mutations (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3) and both clinical outcomes (AF, syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, SCD, stroke) and structural cardiac characteristics (left atrial/ventricular thickness, LVEF) in HCM patients. 2. Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of genotype-positive HCM, aiming to inform clinical risk stratification and management strategies. Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed for English-language articles from 2000 onward using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms identified six studies meeting inclusion criteria. G+ HCM was defined as mutations in MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, or TNNI3. Data analysis employed the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, assessing outcomes via risk ratios and mean differences with random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using appropriate statistical methods. Results: G+ HCM showed significantly increased risk of AF (RR 1.20, p = 0.02) and ventricular arrhythmias (RR 1.56, p = 0.04), with greater left atrial thickness (p = 0.004). No significant differences were found in syncope (p = 0.33), stroke (p = 0.98), or SCD (p = 0.22), left ventricular thickness (p = 0.13), or LVEF (p = 0.10) between G+ and G- patients. These findings underscore the impact of genetic mutations on arrhythmic risk and structural remodeling in HCM. Conclusions: Genetic mutations in MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, and TNNI3 increase AF, ventricular arrhythmias, and left atrial remodeling risks in HCM patients, but do not significantly affect stroke, SCD, syncope, or left ventricular structure. Genetic status is crucial in risk assessment, necessitating close arrhythmia monitoring in G+ patients and further research to refine risk stratification and management strategies in HCM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4335927
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4335927: Gene positive vs. gene negative clinical and structural outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Corinna Brown Ton, Matthias Weber, Amjad Kabach, May Li-Jedras
Circulation
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
article

Abstract 4335927: Gene positive vs. gene negative clinical and structural outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Corinna Brown Ton, Matthias Weber, Amjad Kabach, May Li-Jedras
article en

Abstract

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiovascular disease associated with increased risks of heart failure, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and stroke. Over 1,400 pathogenic variants, primarily in MYH7 and MYBPC3, have been identified, yet the prognostic significance of genetics remains unclear. Recent studies suggest genotype-positive (G+) HCM is linked to earlier diagnosis, greater disease severity, and poorer outcomes, necessitating further research to clarify the relationship between genotype, disease progression, and clinical management. Objectives: 1. Examine the association between genetic mutations (MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, TNNI3) and both clinical outcomes (AF, syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, SCD, stroke) and structural cardiac characteristics (left atrial/ventricular thickness, LVEF) in HCM patients. 2. Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of genotype-positive HCM, aiming to inform clinical risk stratification and management strategies. Methods: A systematic literature search in PubMed for English-language articles from 2000 onward using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms identified six studies meeting inclusion criteria. G+ HCM was defined as mutations in MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, or TNNI3. Data analysis employed the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, assessing outcomes via risk ratios and mean differences with random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using appropriate statistical methods. Results: G+ HCM showed significantly increased risk of AF (RR 1.20, p = 0.02) and ventricular arrhythmias (RR 1.56, p = 0.04), with greater left atrial thickness (p = 0.004). No significant differences were found in syncope (p = 0.33), stroke (p = 0.98), or SCD (p = 0.22), left ventricular thickness (p = 0.13), or LVEF (p = 0.10) between G+ and G- patients. These findings underscore the impact of genetic mutations on arrhythmic risk and structural remodeling in HCM. Conclusions: Genetic mutations in MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2, and TNNI3 increase AF, ventricular arrhythmias, and left atrial remodeling risks in HCM patients, but do not significantly affect stroke, SCD, syncope, or left ventricular structure. Genetic status is crucial in risk assessment, necessitating close arrhythmia monitoring in G+ patients and further research to refine risk stratification and management strategies in HCM.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Creighton University (US), Iowa Western Community College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.