Abstract 4357628: Gaps in Stroke Risk Documentation for Veterans with Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Documentation of atrial fibrillation (AF)-associated stroke risk with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is an AHA/ACC clinical performance measure for outpatient AF management. Patterns of stroke risk documentation for patients with incident AF are not well-characterized. Research Question: What are rates and predictors of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc/CHADS 2 (CHADS) documentation for patients with incident AF across the Veterans Health Administration (VA)? Methods: We developed a text searching algorithm to assess clinical notes for CHADS documentation. We included patients with outpatient AF diagnoses from 1/2022-9/2023 with primary care or cardiology visits within 90 days. We assessed rates of CHADS documentation in primary care/cardiology notes. We identified predictors of documentation using a multivariable logistic regression model including patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, rurality, distance from care, comorbidities, number of visits, diagnosis year, telehealth use, cardiology care use, and facility random intercepts. Results: There were 36,924 patients with new AF with 80,585 visits at 125 VA medical centers. Average age was 74 with 2.9% female, 78% White, 12% Black/African American, and 36% rural/highly rural. Across medical centers, the median rate of CHADS documentation within 90 days was 14.6% (range 0-40.8%) (Figure 1). In the adjusted analysis, CHADS documentation was less likely for patients who were older [age 70-77 adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) and >77 aOR 0.75 (0.70-0.81) vs <70], Black/African American [aOR 0.84 (0.76-0.94) vs White], and rural or highly rural [aOR 0.91 (0.84, 0.99) and aOR 0.80 (0.66, 0.96) vs urban] and for those with certain comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease) and telehealth visits [aOR 0.89 (0.82, 0.95)]. Documentation was more likely for those with more visits, diagnosed in 2023 [aOR 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) vs 2022], and seen by cardiology [aOR 9.14 (8.50, 9.82)] (Figure 2). Conclusions: Though CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc documentation is a performance measure for AF management, we found low documentation rates in clinical notes with significant variation across VA medical centers. Documentation rates were lower for patients who were Black/African American, lived in rural areas, received telehealth care, and whose age/comorbidities resulted in higher scores. Interventions are needed to promote high quality AF care across patient groups and care modalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357628
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357628: Gaps in Stroke Risk Documentation for Veterans with Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Natasha Din, David C. Chan, Paul A. Heidenreich, Neil Kalwani et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4357628: Gaps in Stroke Risk Documentation for Veterans with Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Natasha Din, David C. Chan, Paul A. Heidenreich, Neil Kalwani, Harrison Koos, Alexander T. Sandhu, Rebecca L. Tisdale, Jun Fan, Alexander C. Perino, Lida Safarnejad
article en

Abstract

Background: Documentation of atrial fibrillation (AF)-associated stroke risk with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is an AHA/ACC clinical performance measure for outpatient AF management. Patterns of stroke risk documentation for patients with incident AF are not well-characterized. Research Question: What are rates and predictors of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc/CHADS 2 (CHADS) documentation for patients with incident AF across the Veterans Health Administration (VA)? Methods: We developed a text searching algorithm to assess clinical notes for CHADS documentation. We included patients with outpatient AF diagnoses from 1/2022-9/2023 with primary care or cardiology visits within 90 days. We assessed rates of CHADS documentation in primary care/cardiology notes. We identified predictors of documentation using a multivariable logistic regression model including patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, rurality, distance from care, comorbidities, number of visits, diagnosis year, telehealth use, cardiology care use, and facility random intercepts. Results: There were 36,924 patients with new AF with 80,585 visits at 125 VA medical centers. Average age was 74 with 2.9% female, 78% White, 12% Black/African American, and 36% rural/highly rural. Across medical centers, the median rate of CHADS documentation within 90 days was 14.6% (range 0-40.8%) (Figure 1). In the adjusted analysis, CHADS documentation was less likely for patients who were older [age 70-77 adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.92) and >77 aOR 0.75 (0.70-0.81) vs <70], Black/African American [aOR 0.84 (0.76-0.94) vs White], and rural or highly rural [aOR 0.91 (0.84, 0.99) and aOR 0.80 (0.66, 0.96) vs urban] and for those with certain comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease) and telehealth visits [aOR 0.89 (0.82, 0.95)]. Documentation was more likely for those with more visits, diagnosed in 2023 [aOR 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) vs 2022], and seen by cardiology [aOR 9.14 (8.50, 9.82)] (Figure 2). Conclusions: Though CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc documentation is a performance measure for AF management, we found low documentation rates in clinical notes with significant variation across VA medical centers. Documentation rates were lower for patients who were Black/African American, lived in rural areas, received telehealth care, and whose age/comorbidities resulted in higher scores. Interventions are needed to promote high quality AF care across patient groups and care modalities.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.