Abstract 4370614: The Prognostic Value of Modified Frailty Index in Complications and Survival Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Data-Driven Approach

Introduction: Frailty is a critical condition characterized by reduced physiological reserve. The modified Frailty Index (MFI-5) is a comorbidity-based tool that assesses five health variables to predict morbidity and mortality. While mFI-5 has been effective in various surgical contexts, its application in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been investigated. Objectives: This study evaluates the relationship between mFI-5 scores and PCI outcomes as predictors of complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, focusing on adults aged 60 and older who underwent PCI either within one month or later, having an mFI-5 score of 4. Comparisons were made with those scoring 0, using ICD-10 codes for hypertension, obstructive respiratory disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Individuals with limitations in daily activities were excluded. Propensity score matching was employed to assess outcomes within 365 days post-PCI. Patients with prior outcome occurrences were excluded from analyses. Statistical comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, patients with an MFI score of 4 experienced significantly higher risks of multiple adverse outcomes compared to those with an MFI score of 0. All-cause mortality was significantly elevated (HR 2.289; 95% CI: 1.989–2.634), as were hematomas or hemorrhages (HR 1.746; 95% CI: 1.204–2.531), intraoperative cardiac arrest (HR 2.889; 95% CI: 1.575–5.299), embolism (HR 2.768; 95% CI: 1.868–4.102), AKI (HR 3.324; 95% CI: 2.828–3.907), infection/sepsis (HR 2.205; 95% CI: 1.300–3.741), and composite outcomes including cardiac arrest, subsequent STEMI, IABP use, or shock (HR 2.782; 95% CI: 2.247–3.445). Risks for coronary artery aneurysm/dissection, stroke, ACS not resulting in MI, and pericarditis did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Higher frailty significantly increases the risk of adverse outcomes post-PCI, highlighting its prognostic value and the need for routine frailty assessments in pre-procedural risk stratification. Further studies are needed to validate these findings across broader populations and to develop targeted strategies aimed at reducing the elevated risks associated with frailty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370614
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370614: The Prognostic Value of Modified Frailty Index in Complications and Survival Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Data-Driven Approach

Minaam Farooq, Muhammad Raffey Shabbir, M. Zubair, Geethu Jnaneswaran et al.
Circulation
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Abstract 4370614: The Prognostic Value of Modified Frailty Index in Complications and Survival Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Data-Driven Approach

Minaam Farooq, Muhammad Raffey Shabbir, M. Zubair, Geethu Jnaneswaran, Mahrukh Imtiaz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Frailty is a critical condition characterized by reduced physiological reserve. The modified Frailty Index (MFI-5) is a comorbidity-based tool that assesses five health variables to predict morbidity and mortality. While mFI-5 has been effective in various surgical contexts, its application in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been investigated. Objectives: This study evaluates the relationship between mFI-5 scores and PCI outcomes as predictors of complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, focusing on adults aged 60 and older who underwent PCI either within one month or later, having an mFI-5 score of 4. Comparisons were made with those scoring 0, using ICD-10 codes for hypertension, obstructive respiratory disease, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Individuals with limitations in daily activities were excluded. Propensity score matching was employed to assess outcomes within 365 days post-PCI. Patients with prior outcome occurrences were excluded from analyses. Statistical comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, patients with an MFI score of 4 experienced significantly higher risks of multiple adverse outcomes compared to those with an MFI score of 0. All-cause mortality was significantly elevated (HR 2.289; 95% CI: 1.989–2.634), as were hematomas or hemorrhages (HR 1.746; 95% CI: 1.204–2.531), intraoperative cardiac arrest (HR 2.889; 95% CI: 1.575–5.299), embolism (HR 2.768; 95% CI: 1.868–4.102), AKI (HR 3.324; 95% CI: 2.828–3.907), infection/sepsis (HR 2.205; 95% CI: 1.300–3.741), and composite outcomes including cardiac arrest, subsequent STEMI, IABP use, or shock (HR 2.782; 95% CI: 2.247–3.445). Risks for coronary artery aneurysm/dissection, stroke, ACS not resulting in MI, and pericarditis did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Higher frailty significantly increases the risk of adverse outcomes post-PCI, highlighting its prognostic value and the need for routine frailty assessments in pre-procedural risk stratification. Further studies are needed to validate these findings across broader populations and to develop targeted strategies aimed at reducing the elevated risks associated with frailty.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
South Texas College (US), Marshfield Clinic (US), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK), Marshfield Clinic (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.