Abstract 4366587: Chronotherapy in Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of the Cardiovascular Effects of Bedtime Versus Morning Antihypertensive Administration

Introduction/Background: With the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in the current era, anti-hypertensive therapy has become a mainstay in clinical practice. However, the optimal timing for the dosage of antihypertensive medication remains a subject of ongoing debate and research. Research Questions/Hypothesis: This meta-analysis evaluates whether the bedtime dosing of antihypertensive medication improves cardiovascular outcomes compared to morning dosing. Methods/Approach: We conducted an extensive literature search across three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect) to compile relevant trials published till May 2025. All statistical analyses have been done using RevMan. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), estimated using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Furthermore, the random effects model was applied to account for inter-study heterogeneity. Results/Data: Seven randomized-controlled trials involving a total of 63,333 patients were included. Subgroup analysis showed reductions in cardiovascular outcomes associated with bedtime dosing, primarily driven by trials under the Hermida subgroup. Contrarily, large-scale trials under the non-Hermida subgroup reported no significant difference between bedtime and morning administration, resulting in substantial heterogeneity between subgroups. Our pooled analysis exhibits no statistically significant variation between bedtime and morning dosing in myocardial infarction (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71–1.04), heart failure (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50–1.06), stroke (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.11), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65–1.11), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.09). Conclusion: The overall evidence suggests that the timing of antihypertensive medication has no consequential impact on improving major adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, and hence, bedtime dosing does not confer any consistent clinical advantages over morning administration. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment approaches and advocate for a more patient-centered treatment model, rather than uniform medication timing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366587
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366587: Chronotherapy in Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of the Cardiovascular Effects of Bedtime Versus Morning Antihypertensive Administration

M. Yousuf Sarwar, Fizza Batool, YeBon Lee, Shabnam Fahim et al.
Circulation
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Abstract 4366587: Chronotherapy in Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of the Cardiovascular Effects of Bedtime Versus Morning Antihypertensive Administration

M. Yousuf Sarwar, Fizza Batool, YeBon Lee, Shabnam Fahim, Danish Ali Ashraf, Muhammad A. Riaz, Zoha Aftab, Amna Noor, Naveen Murad Khatoon, Shaikh Muhammad Daniyal, Hareem Ajaz, Habiba Tauiqr
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: With the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in the current era, anti-hypertensive therapy has become a mainstay in clinical practice. However, the optimal timing for the dosage of antihypertensive medication remains a subject of ongoing debate and research. Research Questions/Hypothesis: This meta-analysis evaluates whether the bedtime dosing of antihypertensive medication improves cardiovascular outcomes compared to morning dosing. Methods/Approach: We conducted an extensive literature search across three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect) to compile relevant trials published till May 2025. All statistical analyses have been done using RevMan. Dichotomous outcomes were summarized as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), estimated using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Furthermore, the random effects model was applied to account for inter-study heterogeneity. Results/Data: Seven randomized-controlled trials involving a total of 63,333 patients were included. Subgroup analysis showed reductions in cardiovascular outcomes associated with bedtime dosing, primarily driven by trials under the Hermida subgroup. Contrarily, large-scale trials under the non-Hermida subgroup reported no significant difference between bedtime and morning administration, resulting in substantial heterogeneity between subgroups. Our pooled analysis exhibits no statistically significant variation between bedtime and morning dosing in myocardial infarction (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71–1.04), heart failure (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50–1.06), stroke (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.11), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65–1.11), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61–1.09). Conclusion: The overall evidence suggests that the timing of antihypertensive medication has no consequential impact on improving major adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, and hence, bedtime dosing does not confer any consistent clinical advantages over morning administration. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment approaches and advocate for a more patient-centered treatment model, rather than uniform medication timing strategies.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
St. George's University (GD), Wilmington University (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.