Abstract 4368330: Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion Compared to Optimal Medical Therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is commonly encountered in patients with coronary artery disease and is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased short- and long-term mortality. While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has shown potential clinical benefits in CTO patients, its comparative effectiveness against optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of CTO-PCI versus OMT on key cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of science and Cochrane. We assessed outcomes including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial reinfarction, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: 25 studies with a total of 22102 patients were included. Compared to OMT alone, CTO-PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the overall all-cause mortality (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.53–0.82; p=0.0002), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52–0.82; p=0.0003) and MACE (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71–0.98; p=0.03). No statistically significant differences were observed between CTO-PCI and OMT in rates of Stroke (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68–1.50; p=0.96), Subsequent PCI/CABG (revascularization) (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78–1.29; p=0.97) or Heart Failure Hospitalization (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.37–1.59; p=0.48) Conclusion: This is the largest and most updated systematic review meta analysis for CTO-PCI vs OMT. Our findings show that CTO-PCI is associated with significantly lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to OMT. However, no significant differences were observed between the two strategies in the incidence of stroke, need for subsequent revascularization (PCI/CABG), or heart failure hospitalization.
Authors
- Rana Rashwan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-0062)
- Khaled Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-897X)
- Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5802-2291)
- Mohamed Fawzi Hemida (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0155-1539)
- Rana Elsayed
- Mohamed Elnady (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-7622)
- Ahmed Mohamed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1186-2595)
- Ahmed Elnaggar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-2672)
- Ahmed Diaa
- Mohammed Ashwaq Hussain Shaik
- Aya Elalfy
- Imad Samman Tahhan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3778-1565)
- Zeyad Kholeif
- Hamza Elkasaby
- Mohab Elnashar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2033-5424)
Institutions
- Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Cairo University (EG)
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Al-Azhar University (EG)
- Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science (US)
- Tanta University (EG)
- University of Arkansas Medical Center (US)
- Government Vellore Medical College (IN)
- Jacksonville College (US)
- WinnMed (US)
- Northeast Baptist Hospital (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Menoufia University (EG)
- Alexandria University (EG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368330
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00