Abstract 4366580: Using a proteomics-based test to assess cardiovascular risk in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)

Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is an age-related phenomenon associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, independent of traditional risk factors, which can make risk stratification a challenge. The residual cardiovascular risk (RCVR) test is a recently developed 27-protein model that has been shown to predict 4-year risk of a CV event (myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart failure hospitalization, death) in independent replication cohorts of at-risk populations. Objectives: The goal of this analysis was to evaluate whether the RCVR test could detect significant differences in CV risk between CHIP+ and CHIP- sub-populations using data from the CANTOS trial (NCT01327846), a study that enrolled subjects with a history of cardiovascular disease that were evaluated for their CHIP status. Methods: RCVR test scores were generated from SomaScan v4.1 assay data on EDTA plasma samples from the CANTOS trial. Baseline analysis compared mean RCVR test scores in CHIP+ (n=174) and CHIP- (n=1794) subjects who were either randomized into the placebo or canakinumab treated arms. A linear model of RCVR distributed by CHIP status, with fixed effects of treatment arm, age, and sex was evaluated in a Type III ANOVA to determine covariate adjusted between group differences in RCVR test scores. Results: The mean predicted RCVR test score was 4.96% greater at baseline for CHIP+ subjects compared to CHIP- subjects after adjusting for covariates (p=2.07e-3). Conclusions: The RCVR test predicted that the absolute risk of a cardiovascular event within four years is significantly greater for CHIP+ individuals. These results suggest RCVR may be able to capture the increased CV risk conferred by novel risk factors like CHIP status and highlight the potential utility of multi-protein-based prognostic test as a tool for CV risk assessment. Further analysis of longitudinal time points from the placebo arm of the trial are planned to assess whether cardiovascular risk increases at a different rate in CHIP+ and CHIP- individuals over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366580
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366580: Using a proteomics-based test to assess cardiovascular risk in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)

Sérgio Kaiser, Joseph Gogain, Denise P. Yates, Huilei Xu et al.
Circulation
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Abstract 4366580: Using a proteomics-based test to assess cardiovascular risk in individuals with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)

Sérgio Kaiser, Joseph Gogain, Denise P. Yates, Huilei Xu, Meredith L. Carpenter, Caitlin E. Carey, Joel Wommack, Stephen A. Williams, Jessica Chadwick
article en

Abstract

Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is an age-related phenomenon associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, independent of traditional risk factors, which can make risk stratification a challenge. The residual cardiovascular risk (RCVR) test is a recently developed 27-protein model that has been shown to predict 4-year risk of a CV event (myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart failure hospitalization, death) in independent replication cohorts of at-risk populations. Objectives: The goal of this analysis was to evaluate whether the RCVR test could detect significant differences in CV risk between CHIP+ and CHIP- sub-populations using data from the CANTOS trial (NCT01327846), a study that enrolled subjects with a history of cardiovascular disease that were evaluated for their CHIP status. Methods: RCVR test scores were generated from SomaScan v4.1 assay data on EDTA plasma samples from the CANTOS trial. Baseline analysis compared mean RCVR test scores in CHIP+ (n=174) and CHIP- (n=1794) subjects who were either randomized into the placebo or canakinumab treated arms. A linear model of RCVR distributed by CHIP status, with fixed effects of treatment arm, age, and sex was evaluated in a Type III ANOVA to determine covariate adjusted between group differences in RCVR test scores. Results: The mean predicted RCVR test score was 4.96% greater at baseline for CHIP+ subjects compared to CHIP- subjects after adjusting for covariates (p=2.07e-3). Conclusions: The RCVR test predicted that the absolute risk of a cardiovascular event within four years is significantly greater for CHIP+ individuals. These results suggest RCVR may be able to capture the increased CV risk conferred by novel risk factors like CHIP status and highlight the potential utility of multi-protein-based prognostic test as a tool for CV risk assessment. Further analysis of longitudinal time points from the placebo arm of the trial are planned to assess whether cardiovascular risk increases at a different rate in CHIP+ and CHIP- individuals over time.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Standard Bio (Norway) (NO), Novartis (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.