Abstract 4357689: Upfront Combination of High-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Reduces Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Target-Trial Emulation

Background: High-intensity statin treatment has well-established benefits in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the efficacy of combination therapy with ezetimibe in AMI is uncertain. Until recently, ezetimibe was reserved as add-on therapy for secondary lipid lowering post-AMI. Research Question: Does the upfront combination of high-intensity statin treatment with ezetimibe improve cardiovascular outcomes compared with high-intensity statin treatment alone in patients with AMI? Method: We conducted a target-trial emulation using retrospective data from the TriNetX global platform. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with AMI undergoing revascularization between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2023, were included. Patients with prior use of high-intensity statins (defined as atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg daily), ezetimibe, or previous AMI with revascularization were excluded. Eligible patients were assigned to either combination therapy (high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe) or monotherapy (high-intensity statin alone) within one week of the index AMI. Propensity-score matching (1:1) was used to balance covariates. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent AMI, and stroke or transient ischemic attack. Secondary endpoints included individual components of MACE, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and the rate of achieving LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL. Primary safety endpoints were rhabdomyolysis and acute liver failure. Pneumonia was set as a falsification endpoint. Follow-up continued until one year, death, loss to follow-up, or the occurrence of measures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 5,416 patients (2,708 per group) were included after propensity-score matching. All covariates were balanced (Table 1) . Combination of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe was associated with a significant reduction in MACE compared with statin alone (Figure 1) , as well as reductions in mortality, AMI, and LDL-C (Table 2) . The rate of achieving LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL was superior in the combination group. Safety and falsification endpoints were similar between groups (Table 2) . Conclusion: In patients with AMI undergoing revascularization, upfront combination of a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes and more effective LDL-C lowering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357689
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357689: Upfront Combination of High-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Reduces Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Target-Trial Emulation

Anita Osabutey, Saúl Ríos, Yu‐Sun Chang, Sridhar Mangalesh et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4357689: Upfront Combination of High-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Reduces Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Target-Trial Emulation

Anita Osabutey, Saúl Ríos, Yu‐Sun Chang, Sridhar Mangalesh, Pei‐Lun Lee, Michael G. Nanna, Jiun‐Ruey Hu, Abdulla A. Damluji, Ruey‐Kuen Hsieh, Jincy Thankachen, Michele Nanna, Chidubem Ezenna, Robert Faillace, Kuan Yu, Laura Romero Acero
article en

Abstract

Background: High-intensity statin treatment has well-established benefits in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the efficacy of combination therapy with ezetimibe in AMI is uncertain. Until recently, ezetimibe was reserved as add-on therapy for secondary lipid lowering post-AMI. Research Question: Does the upfront combination of high-intensity statin treatment with ezetimibe improve cardiovascular outcomes compared with high-intensity statin treatment alone in patients with AMI? Method: We conducted a target-trial emulation using retrospective data from the TriNetX global platform. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with AMI undergoing revascularization between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2023, were included. Patients with prior use of high-intensity statins (defined as atorvastatin ≥ 40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥ 20 mg daily), ezetimibe, or previous AMI with revascularization were excluded. Eligible patients were assigned to either combination therapy (high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe) or monotherapy (high-intensity statin alone) within one week of the index AMI. Propensity-score matching (1:1) was used to balance covariates. The primary efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent AMI, and stroke or transient ischemic attack. Secondary endpoints included individual components of MACE, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, and the rate of achieving LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL. Primary safety endpoints were rhabdomyolysis and acute liver failure. Pneumonia was set as a falsification endpoint. Follow-up continued until one year, death, loss to follow-up, or the occurrence of measures. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. Results: A total of 5,416 patients (2,708 per group) were included after propensity-score matching. All covariates were balanced (Table 1) . Combination of high-intensity statin and ezetimibe was associated with a significant reduction in MACE compared with statin alone (Figure 1) , as well as reductions in mortality, AMI, and LDL-C (Table 2) . The rate of achieving LDL-C ≤ 70 mg/dL was superior in the combination group. Safety and falsification endpoints were similar between groups (Table 2) . Conclusion: In patients with AMI undergoing revascularization, upfront combination of a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe was associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes and more effective LDL-C lowering.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), Baystate Medical Center (US), Danbury Hospital (US), Jacobi Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Baystate Health (US), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.