Abstract 4363598: Is Age Just a Number? A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis of Post-Ablation Safety in Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Background: Evidence regarding the safety profile of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation remains limited. As life expectancy increases, a rising number of elderly patients are considered candidates for this procedure. Research Question: What is the safety profile of AF ablation in elderly patients with new AF in a real-world setting? Methods: In this U.S.-based multicenter cohort study (TriNetX dataset), we identified adults (≥ 60 years old) with new AF who underwent catheter ablation within 6 months. Patients were grouped by age at first AF episode: 60–79 years (older adults) and ≥80 years (elderly adults). Patients with prior surgical ablation were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced groups by demographics, comorbidities, and medications. The primary end point was repeat AF ablation at 1-year; secondary endpoints included new or ongoing antiarrhythmic (AAD) use, ischemic stroke, safety outcomes of heart failure (HF) exacerbations, pericardial complications (pericardial effusion, tamponade or hemopericardium), new venous thromboembolism (VTE), cardiac arrest, conduction disease (new complete heart block or sick sinus syndrome), vascular access complications (post-procedural hematomas or aneurysms), all-cause hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Falsification outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI) and herpes zoster. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests compared outcomes; hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were calculated using Cox regression. Results: After matching (N= 5,032 per group), elderly adults were less likely to undergo repeat catheter ablation at 1-year. AAD use and VTE risks were similar between groups. Elderly adults had higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR=1.27, 95% CI = 0.91-1.01, p=0.12) and HF exacerbation (HR=1.67, 95% CI=1.39-2.0, p<0.01). Safety outcomes were similar, however elderly adults were at risk of new conduction disease (HR=1.91, 95% CI = 1.58-2.31, p<0.01). Elderly adults were more likely to be hospitalized (HR= 1.36, 95% CI = 1.26-1.46, p<0.01) and had higher risk of mortality (HR=1.78, 95% CI=1.45-2.22, p<0.01). Falsification outcomes found elderly adults had higher UTI risk (HR=1.68, 95% CI=1.43-1.97, p<0.01). Conclusion: Elderly adults (≥80 years) undergoing catheter ablation had significantly higher risk of complications compared to older adults (60-79 years), underscoring the need for further investigations to mitigate periprocedural risk in AF catheter ablation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363598
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363598: Is Age Just a Number? A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis of Post-Ablation Safety in Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Rahul Ahuja, Pei‐Lun Lee, Pattara Rattanawong, Yu-Chiang Wang et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4363598: Is Age Just a Number? A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis of Post-Ablation Safety in Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Rahul Ahuja, Pei‐Lun Lee, Pattara Rattanawong, Yu-Chiang Wang, Ruey‐Kuen Hsieh, Agara Kumar, Kuan Yu
article en

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the safety profile of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation remains limited. As life expectancy increases, a rising number of elderly patients are considered candidates for this procedure. Research Question: What is the safety profile of AF ablation in elderly patients with new AF in a real-world setting? Methods: In this U.S.-based multicenter cohort study (TriNetX dataset), we identified adults (≥ 60 years old) with new AF who underwent catheter ablation within 6 months. Patients were grouped by age at first AF episode: 60–79 years (older adults) and ≥80 years (elderly adults). Patients with prior surgical ablation were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1) balanced groups by demographics, comorbidities, and medications. The primary end point was repeat AF ablation at 1-year; secondary endpoints included new or ongoing antiarrhythmic (AAD) use, ischemic stroke, safety outcomes of heart failure (HF) exacerbations, pericardial complications (pericardial effusion, tamponade or hemopericardium), new venous thromboembolism (VTE), cardiac arrest, conduction disease (new complete heart block or sick sinus syndrome), vascular access complications (post-procedural hematomas or aneurysms), all-cause hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. Falsification outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI) and herpes zoster. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests compared outcomes; hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were calculated using Cox regression. Results: After matching (N= 5,032 per group), elderly adults were less likely to undergo repeat catheter ablation at 1-year. AAD use and VTE risks were similar between groups. Elderly adults had higher risk of ischemic stroke (HR=1.27, 95% CI = 0.91-1.01, p=0.12) and HF exacerbation (HR=1.67, 95% CI=1.39-2.0, p<0.01). Safety outcomes were similar, however elderly adults were at risk of new conduction disease (HR=1.91, 95% CI = 1.58-2.31, p<0.01). Elderly adults were more likely to be hospitalized (HR= 1.36, 95% CI = 1.26-1.46, p<0.01) and had higher risk of mortality (HR=1.78, 95% CI=1.45-2.22, p<0.01). Falsification outcomes found elderly adults had higher UTI risk (HR=1.68, 95% CI=1.43-1.97, p<0.01). Conclusion: Elderly adults (≥80 years) undergoing catheter ablation had significantly higher risk of complications compared to older adults (60-79 years), underscoring the need for further investigations to mitigate periprocedural risk in AF catheter ablation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), University of Hawaii System (US), Danbury Hospital (US), Jacobi Medical Center (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Honolulu University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.