Abstract 4367056: Utilizing Epicardial Adipose Tissue As A Risk Marker For Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Background: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) “fat-omics” is an inflammation-sensitive depot that may provide prognostic information in cardiometabolic disease. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is associated with high rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF). We assess the utility of opportunistic EAT radiomic analysis in patients with CKD undergoing CT calcium-score (CTCS) scans and its association and mediation of adverse events. Hypothesis: Stage-specific EAT features in CKD mediates MACE and HF risk. Methods: Using data obtained from the CLARIFY registry (NCT04075162), a large prospective study of no-charge CAC testing, we performed descriptive analysis on patients with CKD via a 1:1 propensity matching approach after balancing for age, race, gender, hypertension, smoking, medications, and CAC score. Due to limited power, CKD was categorized into the combined stage (GFR <60), stage 3a (CKD-3a with GFR 45-59), and CKD stages 3b-4 (CKD-3b4 with GFR 15-30). A validated AI segmentation tool was used to segment EAT, followed by extraction of >200 “fat-omics” features from EAT in 4 inferior-to-superior cardiac spanning slab quartiles (PQ) Hounsfield unit (HU) histogram bins (20-HU increments), and more. We performed time to event Kaplan Meier analysis in propensity-matched and the unmatched cohorts for MACE and HF, and mediation analyses to quantify the proportion of effects mediated by significant fat-omics features. Results: A total of 1594 patients with CKD (1170 CKD-3a and 308 CKD-3b4) were included in the study. In the overall CKD group, there were 5 unique EAT features including total HU skewness and kurtosis HU in the superior slab of the heart, involving major coronary arteries. CKD-3a had 61 unique features and CKD3b-4 had 53 unique features. When compared to the propensity-matched non-CKD cohort, the overall CKD group and CKD 3b-4 had significantly worse MACE-free probability (p<0.005) ( Figure 1 ) and worse HF-free probability (p<0.005) ( Figure 2 ). Mediation analysis in the CKD 3b-4 cohort revealed 8 EAT features in the superior slab of the heart (PQ4) in the higher HU range (130-50) that mediated MACE. 11 features that significantly mediated HF also mainly involved the superior slab. Conclusions: Propensity-matched CKD patients have higher MACE and HF events when compared to non-CKD patients. CKD patients have distinct EAT features and appear to be in the mediation pathway for MACE and HF risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367056
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367056: Utilizing Epicardial Adipose Tissue As A Risk Marker For Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Robert Okyere, William Marion, Salil V. Deo, David L. Wilson et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4367056: Utilizing Epicardial Adipose Tissue As A Risk Marker For Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Robert Okyere, William Marion, Salil V. Deo, David L. Wilson, Joseph Amoah, Sneha Kandi, Ian J. Neeland, Santosh Kumar Sirasapalli, Prerna Singh, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Sai Rahul Ponnana, Michael Glidden
article en

Abstract

Background: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) “fat-omics” is an inflammation-sensitive depot that may provide prognostic information in cardiometabolic disease. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is associated with high rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure (HF). We assess the utility of opportunistic EAT radiomic analysis in patients with CKD undergoing CT calcium-score (CTCS) scans and its association and mediation of adverse events. Hypothesis: Stage-specific EAT features in CKD mediates MACE and HF risk. Methods: Using data obtained from the CLARIFY registry (NCT04075162), a large prospective study of no-charge CAC testing, we performed descriptive analysis on patients with CKD via a 1:1 propensity matching approach after balancing for age, race, gender, hypertension, smoking, medications, and CAC score. Due to limited power, CKD was categorized into the combined stage (GFR <60), stage 3a (CKD-3a with GFR 45-59), and CKD stages 3b-4 (CKD-3b4 with GFR 15-30). A validated AI segmentation tool was used to segment EAT, followed by extraction of >200 “fat-omics” features from EAT in 4 inferior-to-superior cardiac spanning slab quartiles (PQ) Hounsfield unit (HU) histogram bins (20-HU increments), and more. We performed time to event Kaplan Meier analysis in propensity-matched and the unmatched cohorts for MACE and HF, and mediation analyses to quantify the proportion of effects mediated by significant fat-omics features. Results: A total of 1594 patients with CKD (1170 CKD-3a and 308 CKD-3b4) were included in the study. In the overall CKD group, there were 5 unique EAT features including total HU skewness and kurtosis HU in the superior slab of the heart, involving major coronary arteries. CKD-3a had 61 unique features and CKD3b-4 had 53 unique features. When compared to the propensity-matched non-CKD cohort, the overall CKD group and CKD 3b-4 had significantly worse MACE-free probability (p<0.005) ( Figure 1 ) and worse HF-free probability (p<0.005) ( Figure 2 ). Mediation analysis in the CKD 3b-4 cohort revealed 8 EAT features in the superior slab of the heart (PQ4) in the higher HU range (130-50) that mediated MACE. 11 features that significantly mediated HF also mainly involved the superior slab. Conclusions: Propensity-matched CKD patients have higher MACE and HF events when compared to non-CKD patients. CKD patients have distinct EAT features and appear to be in the mediation pathway for MACE and HF risk.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.