Abstract 4363507: Higher Blood Pressure Time-in-Target Range May Improve Primary Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction: Higher blood pressure Time-in-Target Range (BP-TTR) has been associated with lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes. However, the prognostic value of BP-TTR among patients with hypertension (HTN) and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Research Question: Is higher BP-TTR over a 6-month period associated with a reduced risk of primary cardiovascular outcome (composite all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) among patients with HTN+CAD? Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the randomized INternational VErapamil-trandolapril STudy (INVEST), we pooled patients (aged ≥50 years with HTN+CAD) randomized to a calcium antagonist or non-calcium antagonist strategy, which had equivalent outcomes in INVEST. Of 22,576 INVEST participants, we identified those with ≥4 BP readings, and without the primary outcome or loss to follow-up within the first 6 months post-randomization (including randomization date). We performed linear interpolation with constant extrapolation using eligible participants’ BP readings during this 6-month period (168 days) to estimate BP-TTR, defined as the proportion of days with BP readings below the target (140/90 mmHg) over the 168-day window. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between BP-TTR in the first 6 months post-randomization and the primary outcome thereafter. Results: A total of 12,952 eligible participants were included (mean±SD age, 66.1±9.6 years; 48.6% men). Among four BP-TTR groups (0–25%, >25–50%, >50–75%, and >75–100%), individuals with a BP-TTR of >75–100% had the lowest incidence rate of the primary outcome (35.2 per 1,000 person-years). Compared to individuals in the lowest BP-TTR group, those in higher BP-TTR groups had a reduced risk of the primary outcome in both unadjusted and adjusted models. However, statistically significant reductions were observed only in the unadjusted model for the BP-TTR >50–75% group (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.84 [0.71-0.99]; p=0.036), and the BP-TTR >75–100% group (0.79 [0.69-0.92]; p=0.002). Conclusions: In patients with HTN+CAD, higher BP-TTR at the target of <140/90 mmHg may be associated with a reduced risk of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke, though statistical significance was not reached after adjustment. As a next step, we plan to conduct additional analyses applying alternative BP targets and assessing other outcomes in the INVEST.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4363507
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4363507: Higher Blood Pressure Time-in-Target Range May Improve Primary Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease

Steven M. Smith, N. Nguyen, Carl J. Pepine
Circulation
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Abstract 4363507: Higher Blood Pressure Time-in-Target Range May Improve Primary Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease

Steven M. Smith, N. Nguyen, Carl J. Pepine
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Higher blood pressure Time-in-Target Range (BP-TTR) has been associated with lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes. However, the prognostic value of BP-TTR among patients with hypertension (HTN) and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Research Question: Is higher BP-TTR over a 6-month period associated with a reduced risk of primary cardiovascular outcome (composite all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke) among patients with HTN+CAD? Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the randomized INternational VErapamil-trandolapril STudy (INVEST), we pooled patients (aged ≥50 years with HTN+CAD) randomized to a calcium antagonist or non-calcium antagonist strategy, which had equivalent outcomes in INVEST. Of 22,576 INVEST participants, we identified those with ≥4 BP readings, and without the primary outcome or loss to follow-up within the first 6 months post-randomization (including randomization date). We performed linear interpolation with constant extrapolation using eligible participants’ BP readings during this 6-month period (168 days) to estimate BP-TTR, defined as the proportion of days with BP readings below the target (140/90 mmHg) over the 168-day window. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between BP-TTR in the first 6 months post-randomization and the primary outcome thereafter. Results: A total of 12,952 eligible participants were included (mean±SD age, 66.1±9.6 years; 48.6% men). Among four BP-TTR groups (0–25%, >25–50%, >50–75%, and >75–100%), individuals with a BP-TTR of >75–100% had the lowest incidence rate of the primary outcome (35.2 per 1,000 person-years). Compared to individuals in the lowest BP-TTR group, those in higher BP-TTR groups had a reduced risk of the primary outcome in both unadjusted and adjusted models. However, statistically significant reductions were observed only in the unadjusted model for the BP-TTR >50–75% group (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.84 [0.71-0.99]; p=0.036), and the BP-TTR >75–100% group (0.79 [0.69-0.92]; p=0.002). Conclusions: In patients with HTN+CAD, higher BP-TTR at the target of <140/90 mmHg may be associated with a reduced risk of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke, though statistical significance was not reached after adjustment. As a next step, we plan to conduct additional analyses applying alternative BP targets and assessing other outcomes in the INVEST.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.