Abstract 4367097: Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Real-World TriNetX Cohort Study

Background: The optimal long-term antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. While oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy may reduce bleeding risk, concerns persist regarding its effectiveness in preventing ischemic events compared to combined OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of OAC monotherapy versus combined OAC and SAPT in a real-world cohort of patients with AF and stable CAD, ≥1 year post-PCI. Methods: Using the TriNetX global federated health research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 6,950 matched patients on OAC monotherapy and 6,950 matched patients on combined OAC and SAPT, after propensity score matching from initial cohorts of 10,304 and 8,235 patients, respectively. Outcomes evaluated at 1 and 3 years included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major bleeding events. Results: At 1 year, OAC monotherapy had higher mortality (10.8% vs. 6.7%; OR 1.690, CI [1.497,1.907], p<0.001), lower stroke risk (5.4% vs. 6.4%; OR 0.835, CI [0.725,0.963], p=0.013), higher MI (36.2% vs. 17.8%; OR 2.624, CI [2.426,2.839], p<0.001), with no difference in PE (1.6% vs. 1.3%; OR 1.2, CI [0.965,1.699], p=0.086) or bleeding (5.3% each; OR 1.0, CI [0.862,1.161], p=1.0). At 3 years, OAC monotherapy demonstrated sustained higher mortality (13.6% vs. 12.3%; OR 1.128, CI [1.021,1.245], p=0.018), higher MI (36.7% vs. 24.6%; OR 1.772, CI [1.647,1.907], p<0.001), reduced stroke risk (5.8% vs. 9.1%; OR 0.617, CI [0.542,0.702], p<0.001), and lower bleeding (6.0% vs. 8.5%; OR 0.683, CI [0.600,0.778], p<0.001), with no difference in PE. Conclusions: In this large, real-world matched cohort, OAC monotherapy in patients with AF and stable CAD post-PCI was associated with increased mortality and significantly higher myocardial infarction rates despite a reduction in ischemic stroke compared to combined therapy. OAC monotherapy was associated with significantly lower bleeding risk at 3 years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367097
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367097: Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Real-World TriNetX Cohort Study

Anil KC, Abdallah Rayyan, Mohd A. Daise, Omar S. Obeidat et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4367097: Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy vs Dual Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights from a Real-World TriNetX Cohort Study

Anil KC, Abdallah Rayyan, Mohd A. Daise, Omar S. Obeidat, Mohamad Jihad Mansour, Qusai Alqudah, Aseed Mestarihi
article en

Abstract

Background: The optimal long-term antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. While oral anticoagulant (OAC) monotherapy may reduce bleeding risk, concerns persist regarding its effectiveness in preventing ischemic events compared to combined OAC and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). Aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of OAC monotherapy versus combined OAC and SAPT in a real-world cohort of patients with AF and stable CAD, ≥1 year post-PCI. Methods: Using the TriNetX global federated health research network, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis including 6,950 matched patients on OAC monotherapy and 6,950 matched patients on combined OAC and SAPT, after propensity score matching from initial cohorts of 10,304 and 8,235 patients, respectively. Outcomes evaluated at 1 and 3 years included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major bleeding events. Results: At 1 year, OAC monotherapy had higher mortality (10.8% vs. 6.7%; OR 1.690, CI [1.497,1.907], p<0.001), lower stroke risk (5.4% vs. 6.4%; OR 0.835, CI [0.725,0.963], p=0.013), higher MI (36.2% vs. 17.8%; OR 2.624, CI [2.426,2.839], p<0.001), with no difference in PE (1.6% vs. 1.3%; OR 1.2, CI [0.965,1.699], p=0.086) or bleeding (5.3% each; OR 1.0, CI [0.862,1.161], p=1.0). At 3 years, OAC monotherapy demonstrated sustained higher mortality (13.6% vs. 12.3%; OR 1.128, CI [1.021,1.245], p=0.018), higher MI (36.7% vs. 24.6%; OR 1.772, CI [1.647,1.907], p<0.001), reduced stroke risk (5.8% vs. 9.1%; OR 0.617, CI [0.542,0.702], p<0.001), and lower bleeding (6.0% vs. 8.5%; OR 0.683, CI [0.600,0.778], p<0.001), with no difference in PE. Conclusions: In this large, real-world matched cohort, OAC monotherapy in patients with AF and stable CAD post-PCI was associated with increased mortality and significantly higher myocardial infarction rates despite a reduction in ischemic stroke compared to combined therapy. OAC monotherapy was associated with significantly lower bleeding risk at 3 years.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Central Florida (US), UF Health Shands Hospital (US), University of Florida (US), MedStar Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.