Abstract Sat1204: Agency Epinephrine Dosing Intervals and Patient Characteristics in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A National EMS Study

Background: The optimal timing of epinephrine dosing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, and practice patterns may vary across emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. Understanding how epinephrine dosing intervals align with published guidelines as well as patient and arrest characteristics may provide insight into system-level influences on cardiac arrest care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-traumatic adult OHCAs in the United States from 2019–2023 using the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) database. Cases were included if they received at least two doses of epinephrine with associated timestamps. Agencies that treated fewer than five OHCAs during the study period were excluded. The most frequent (modal) epinephrine interval was calculated for each agency, and agencies were stratified into four groups: <3 minutes, 3-5 minutes (guideline-reference), >5&<10 minutes, and ≥10 minutes. Agency, patient, and cardiac arrest characteristics were compared across groups, including agency volume, urbanicity, age, sex, race/ethnicity, location, witnessed status, CPR prior to EMS arrival, and initial rhythm. Results: Of 2,170,129 OHCAs, 811,959 treated by 6,728 EMS agencies met inclusion criteria. Most OHCAs (85.9%) were treated by agencies in the guideline-reference group (3-5 minute), 9.5% ≤3 minute group, 3.5% >5&<10 minutes, and 1.2% ≥10 minutes. Agencies with longer modal intervals were primarily urban (>5&<10 - 94.9%, ≥10 minutes - 94.9%, 3-5 minutes - 83.7%), and had higher median cardiac arrest volumes (>5&<10 – 2,576, ≥10 minutes - 2,125, 3-5 minutes - 432). Urbanicity and OHCA volume were similar between the 3-5 minutes and <3 minutes groups. Patient and arrest characteristics were generally similar across groups, though agencies in the ≥10 minute group had a higher proportion of public location arrests (13.0% vs 10.9% for 3-5 minutes). CPR prior to EMS arrival was also less frequent in the ≥10 minute group (21.5 vs. 26.0% for 3-5 minutes). Conclusion: The majority of agencies demonstrated epinephrine dosing intervals consistent with guidelines. A small proportion exhibited longer intervals, particularly among higher-volume urban agencies, which suggests this is likely an intentional practice. These findings highlight variability in epinephrine dose-interval practices across US EMS agencies with the potential to explore resulting differences in OHCA outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat1204
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat1204: Agency Epinephrine Dosing Intervals and Patient Characteristics in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A National EMS Study

Darren Braude, Michael DeFilippo, Benjamin Fisher, C Root et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat1204: Agency Epinephrine Dosing Intervals and Patient Characteristics in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A National EMS Study

Darren Braude, Michael DeFilippo, Benjamin Fisher, C Root, Ryan Huebinger, Harold Covert
article en

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of epinephrine dosing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, and practice patterns may vary across emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. Understanding how epinephrine dosing intervals align with published guidelines as well as patient and arrest characteristics may provide insight into system-level influences on cardiac arrest care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-traumatic adult OHCAs in the United States from 2019–2023 using the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) database. Cases were included if they received at least two doses of epinephrine with associated timestamps. Agencies that treated fewer than five OHCAs during the study period were excluded. The most frequent (modal) epinephrine interval was calculated for each agency, and agencies were stratified into four groups: <3 minutes, 3-5 minutes (guideline-reference), >5&<10 minutes, and ≥10 minutes. Agency, patient, and cardiac arrest characteristics were compared across groups, including agency volume, urbanicity, age, sex, race/ethnicity, location, witnessed status, CPR prior to EMS arrival, and initial rhythm. Results: Of 2,170,129 OHCAs, 811,959 treated by 6,728 EMS agencies met inclusion criteria. Most OHCAs (85.9%) were treated by agencies in the guideline-reference group (3-5 minute), 9.5% ≤3 minute group, 3.5% >5&<10 minutes, and 1.2% ≥10 minutes. Agencies with longer modal intervals were primarily urban (>5&<10 - 94.9%, ≥10 minutes - 94.9%, 3-5 minutes - 83.7%), and had higher median cardiac arrest volumes (>5&<10 – 2,576, ≥10 minutes - 2,125, 3-5 minutes - 432). Urbanicity and OHCA volume were similar between the 3-5 minutes and <3 minutes groups. Patient and arrest characteristics were generally similar across groups, though agencies in the ≥10 minute group had a higher proportion of public location arrests (13.0% vs 10.9% for 3-5 minutes). CPR prior to EMS arrival was also less frequent in the ≥10 minute group (21.5 vs. 26.0% for 3-5 minutes). Conclusion: The majority of agencies demonstrated epinephrine dosing intervals consistent with guidelines. A small proportion exhibited longer intervals, particularly among higher-volume urban agencies, which suggests this is likely an intentional practice. These findings highlight variability in epinephrine dose-interval practices across US EMS agencies with the potential to explore resulting differences in OHCA outcomes.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of New Mexico Hospital (US), University of New Mexico (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.