Abstract 4367080: Timeseries Foundation Model for Ventricular Tachycardia Detection in the Intensive Care Unit

Introduction: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening clinical condition and common cause of cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The current ICU-VT clinical care model is reactionary, determined by alarm-triggered notifications following VT onset involving poorly performing R-peak-dependent features subject to waveform distortion. Timeseries foundation models (TFMs) circumvent these limitations by learning intrinsic patterns directly from raw electrocardiogram (ECG) data. We hypothesized that TFM-based VT event detection reduces false alarms while maintaining high sensitivity for true VT events. Methods: We analyzed previously adjudicated VT alarms events from PhysioNet VTaC dataset. A board-certified electrophysiologist (T.D.) further annotated exact VT onset and offset event times from N=1241 cases. ECG lead II waveforms were segmented into 512-data-point windows and labeled as VT-positive if >75% of the segment overlapped with annotated VT. These segments were processed using MOMENT, a TFM pretrained on diverse timeseries data to generate representations. The resulting features were used for training a Support Vector Machine classifier for VT. For testing, we evaluated N=206 bedside monitor-reported VT alarms (06/2024-11/2024) from the University of Maryland Medical Center, adjudicated by T.D., resulting in N=31 (15%) true and N=175 false (85%) VT events. Results: In the testing dataset, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.83). At the optimal operating threshold, sensitivity was 74.2% (N=23/31 true VT detected) with 84.6%, specificity (N=148/175 non-VT events identified correctly). Negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.1% vs. positive predictive value (PPV) of 46.1%. The absolute false alarm rate decreased from 85.0% to 15.3%. Conclusions: We developed a TFM that enables accurate VT detection with generalizable waveform representations, and rules out false alarms effectively toward reducing alarm fatigue while ensuring timely response to true VT events. Future work integrating data from multiple patient-level waveforms (e.g. blood pressure, others) and 1 ECG lead is expected to optimize true VT event detection further and establish a refined TFM that is clinically actionable for ICU patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367080
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367080: Timeseries Foundation Model for Ventricular Tachycardia Detection in the Intensive Care Unit

Bradley A. Maron, Shiming Yang, Peter Hu, Seyyede Fatemeh Shams et al.
Circulation
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Abstract 4367080: Timeseries Foundation Model for Ventricular Tachycardia Detection in the Intensive Care Unit

Bradley A. Maron, Shiming Yang, Peter Hu, Seyyede Fatemeh Shams, Timm Dickfeld, Xiangxiang Kong, William Teeter, Meagan Watkins, Nalluri Naren
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening clinical condition and common cause of cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The current ICU-VT clinical care model is reactionary, determined by alarm-triggered notifications following VT onset involving poorly performing R-peak-dependent features subject to waveform distortion. Timeseries foundation models (TFMs) circumvent these limitations by learning intrinsic patterns directly from raw electrocardiogram (ECG) data. We hypothesized that TFM-based VT event detection reduces false alarms while maintaining high sensitivity for true VT events. Methods: We analyzed previously adjudicated VT alarms events from PhysioNet VTaC dataset. A board-certified electrophysiologist (T.D.) further annotated exact VT onset and offset event times from N=1241 cases. ECG lead II waveforms were segmented into 512-data-point windows and labeled as VT-positive if >75% of the segment overlapped with annotated VT. These segments were processed using MOMENT, a TFM pretrained on diverse timeseries data to generate representations. The resulting features were used for training a Support Vector Machine classifier for VT. For testing, we evaluated N=206 bedside monitor-reported VT alarms (06/2024-11/2024) from the University of Maryland Medical Center, adjudicated by T.D., resulting in N=31 (15%) true and N=175 false (85%) VT events. Results: In the testing dataset, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.83). At the optimal operating threshold, sensitivity was 74.2% (N=23/31 true VT detected) with 84.6%, specificity (N=148/175 non-VT events identified correctly). Negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.1% vs. positive predictive value (PPV) of 46.1%. The absolute false alarm rate decreased from 85.0% to 15.3%. Conclusions: We developed a TFM that enables accurate VT detection with generalizable waveform representations, and rules out false alarms effectively toward reducing alarm fatigue while ensuring timely response to true VT events. Future work integrating data from multiple patient-level waveforms (e.g. blood pressure, others) and 1 ECG lead is expected to optimize true VT event detection further and establish a refined TFM that is clinically actionable for ICU patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical System (US), Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.