Abstract 4361781: Evaluation of the PREVENT Risk Assessment Tool and Visceral Adiposity: Insights from the UK Biobank

Background: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a metabolically active fat depot strongly associated with cardiometabolic disease. This study evaluates whether MRI-derived VAT enhances the discrimination and calibration of the PREVENT model for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) heart failure (HF), and total cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large, population-based cohort. Methods: We included 38,373 UK Biobank participants who underwent abdominal MRI and had no known CVD at baseline. We assessed whether adding VAT to PREVENT would improve model performance using C-statistics and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results: The mean age was 54.86 years (SD 7.49), and 52% of participants were female. The median VAT volume was 3.58L (IQR:2.14-5.33). Using the overall median VAT value as the threshold, higher visceral adiposity (>3.58L) was associated with significantly increased risk of ASCVD (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15–1.51), heart failure (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27–1.89), and total CVD (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23–1.55) adjusting for age and sex ( Figure 1 ). Adding VAT to the PREVENT model did not significantly improve discrimination for ASCVD (C-statistic 0.731 vs. 0.729, p = 0.85), nor for HF or total CVD. However, VAT significantly improved reclassification: NRI for ASCVD was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30–0.33), for HF was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.35–0.61), and for total CVD was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46) ( Table 1 ). The association between VAT and all outcomes remained robust after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions: MRI-measured visceral adiposity is associated with increased risk of ASCVD, HF, and total CVD. While VAT did not improve overall discrimination of the PREVENT model, it significantly enhanced reclassification—particularly for HF. This suggests that VAT may improve individualized cardiovascular risk stratification and inform targeted preventive strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361781
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361781: Evaluation of the PREVENT Risk Assessment Tool and Visceral Adiposity: Insights from the UK Biobank

Laurence S. Sperling, Matthew E. Campbell, Anurag Mehta, Michael D. Shapiro et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4361781: Evaluation of the PREVENT Risk Assessment Tool and Visceral Adiposity: Insights from the UK Biobank

Laurence S. Sperling, Matthew E. Campbell, Anurag Mehta, Michael D. Shapiro, Rohan Dod, Salvatore Carbone, Fadi N. Salloum, Nicholas Chew, Pamela Alebna, Arshed Ali Quyyumi, Matthew Ambrosio, Neha Jadeja Pagidipati
article en

Abstract

Background: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is a metabolically active fat depot strongly associated with cardiometabolic disease. This study evaluates whether MRI-derived VAT enhances the discrimination and calibration of the PREVENT model for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) heart failure (HF), and total cardiovascular disease (CVD) in a large, population-based cohort. Methods: We included 38,373 UK Biobank participants who underwent abdominal MRI and had no known CVD at baseline. We assessed whether adding VAT to PREVENT would improve model performance using C-statistics and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results: The mean age was 54.86 years (SD 7.49), and 52% of participants were female. The median VAT volume was 3.58L (IQR:2.14-5.33). Using the overall median VAT value as the threshold, higher visceral adiposity (>3.58L) was associated with significantly increased risk of ASCVD (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15–1.51), heart failure (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27–1.89), and total CVD (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23–1.55) adjusting for age and sex ( Figure 1 ). Adding VAT to the PREVENT model did not significantly improve discrimination for ASCVD (C-statistic 0.731 vs. 0.729, p = 0.85), nor for HF or total CVD. However, VAT significantly improved reclassification: NRI for ASCVD was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30–0.33), for HF was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.35–0.61), and for total CVD was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46) ( Table 1 ). The association between VAT and all outcomes remained robust after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions: MRI-measured visceral adiposity is associated with increased risk of ASCVD, HF, and total CVD. While VAT did not improve overall discrimination of the PREVENT model, it significantly enhanced reclassification—particularly for HF. This suggests that VAT may improve individualized cardiovascular risk stratification and inform targeted preventive strategies.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Emory University (US), Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), National University Heart Centre Singapore (SG), National University Health System (SG), Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.