Abstract 4361795: Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-Dose versus Full-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) face high risks of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding during prolonged oral anticoagulant therapy. While full-dose oral anticoagulants are commonly used, the safety and efficacy of reduced doses after initial treatment are unclear. Hypothesis: Reduced-dose oral anticoagulants are as effective as full-dose therapy in preventing thromboembolism, with a lower bleeding risk in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing reduced-dose and full-dose oral anticoagulants in adults with active cancer and VTE. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A random-effects model analyzed outcomes, including major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (per International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria), a composite of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and individual risks of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, VTE recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Results: Three RCTs with 2,361 patients were included. Two studies compared apixaban 2.5 mg versus 5 mg twice daily, and one compared rivaroxaban 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily. Reduced-dose therapy significantly lowered the composite outcome risk (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64–0.93; p=0.006; Figure 1) and combined major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding risk (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62–0.93; p=0.008; Figure 2) versus full-dose therapy. No significant differences were found for major bleeding (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46–1.17; p=0.194), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.62–1.02; p=0.076), VTE recurrence (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.51–1.38; p=0.482), or all-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.14; p=0.526; Figure 3). Conclusions: Our study suggests that reduced-dose oral anticoagulants appear as effective as full-dose therapy for preventing thromboembolism in cancer-associated VTE, with a reduced bleeding risk. This supports reduced-dose therapy as a safe long-term option in selected patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361795
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361795: Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-Dose versus Full-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Juliana Giorgi, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, W Oliveira, Larissa Coutinho de Lucena et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4361795: Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-Dose versus Full-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Juliana Giorgi, Kleyton Santos de Medeiros, W Oliveira, Larissa Coutinho de Lucena, Amanda Duarte, Nicole Felix, Larissa Calixto Hespanhol, Juliana Muniz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) face high risks of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding during prolonged oral anticoagulant therapy. While full-dose oral anticoagulants are commonly used, the safety and efficacy of reduced doses after initial treatment are unclear. Hypothesis: Reduced-dose oral anticoagulants are as effective as full-dose therapy in preventing thromboembolism, with a lower bleeding risk in patients with cancer-associated VTE. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing reduced-dose and full-dose oral anticoagulants in adults with active cancer and VTE. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. A random-effects model analyzed outcomes, including major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (per International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria), a composite of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and individual risks of major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, VTE recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Results: Three RCTs with 2,361 patients were included. Two studies compared apixaban 2.5 mg versus 5 mg twice daily, and one compared rivaroxaban 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily. Reduced-dose therapy significantly lowered the composite outcome risk (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64–0.93; p=0.006; Figure 1) and combined major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding risk (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62–0.93; p=0.008; Figure 2) versus full-dose therapy. No significant differences were found for major bleeding (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46–1.17; p=0.194), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.62–1.02; p=0.076), VTE recurrence (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.51–1.38; p=0.482), or all-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.78–1.14; p=0.526; Figure 3). Conclusions: Our study suggests that reduced-dose oral anticoagulants appear as effective as full-dose therapy for preventing thromboembolism in cancer-associated VTE, with a reduced bleeding risk. This supports reduced-dose therapy as a safe long-term option in selected patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR), League Against Cancer (US), Kliniken Schmieder (DE), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.