Abstract 4350203: From Image to Insight: Precise and fast RV Volumetry using 2D-Echocardiography

Background: Accurate assessment of right ventricular (RV) volume is crucial for monitoring patients with congenital heart defects (CHD). However, due to the RV's complex geometry, 2D transthoracic echocardiography (2D TTE) is challenging, and MRI is commonly used to evaluate RV volume. Despite its accuracy, MRI has several limitations: it lacks bedside imaging, is time-consuming, costly, and often requires sedation in CHD patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a reliable, simple, and quick method for calculating RV volume using 2D TTE. Methods: Standard apical four-chamber (4CH) and parasternal short-axis (SAX) views were obtained using 2D TTE in patients with CHD during routine follow-up (Figure 1). RV volumes were calculated using the conventional ellipsoidal shell model formula, a truncated cone model and a novel approach based on a cone model. The results were compared with RV volumes obtained via MRI. Results: Forty CHD patients (median age: 23.1 years) were included. The proposed cone-based formula (CBF) showed excellent correlation with MRI-derived RV volumes (systolic: r = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.97; diastolic: r = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86–0.96), with intercepts of 2.5 ml (systolic) and 25.45 ml (diastolic) (Figure 2). The mean difference from MRI volumes was 0.1 ml (0.001%, SD ±13.3) for systolic and 5.2 ml (3%, SD ±28.2) for diastolic volume. Based on root mean square error (RMSE)—considered the most appropriate metric of model fit under linear assumptions—CBF outperformed the ellipsoidal shell model (RMSE 13.2/28.4 ml vs. 20.8/52.6 ml, systolic/diastolic) and the truncated cone model (RMSE 25.1/42.3 ml, systolic/diastolic) (Figure 3). These findings held true even in patients with RV enlargement (mean RVEDVi: 98.6 ml/m2) Conclusion: Our method shows excellent alignment with the data, as indicated by the low y-axis intercept and RSME, while maintaining strong correlation with MRI measurements. It offers an accurate and rapid method for bedside assessment of RV volume, enhancing prompt and precise clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4350203
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4350203: From Image to Insight: Precise and fast RV Volumetry using 2D-Echocardiography

Jan Brüning, Raphael Seiler, Axel Hinke, Stanislav Ovrutskiy et al.
Circulation
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Abstract 4350203: From Image to Insight: Precise and fast RV Volumetry using 2D-Echocardiography

Jan Brüning, Raphael Seiler, Axel Hinke, Stanislav Ovrutskiy, Felix Berger, Felix Günther, Alexander I. Bobenko, Titus Kühne, Teresa Lerach, Robert Dragendorf, Florian Groβ
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of right ventricular (RV) volume is crucial for monitoring patients with congenital heart defects (CHD). However, due to the RV's complex geometry, 2D transthoracic echocardiography (2D TTE) is challenging, and MRI is commonly used to evaluate RV volume. Despite its accuracy, MRI has several limitations: it lacks bedside imaging, is time-consuming, costly, and often requires sedation in CHD patients. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a reliable, simple, and quick method for calculating RV volume using 2D TTE. Methods: Standard apical four-chamber (4CH) and parasternal short-axis (SAX) views were obtained using 2D TTE in patients with CHD during routine follow-up (Figure 1). RV volumes were calculated using the conventional ellipsoidal shell model formula, a truncated cone model and a novel approach based on a cone model. The results were compared with RV volumes obtained via MRI. Results: Forty CHD patients (median age: 23.1 years) were included. The proposed cone-based formula (CBF) showed excellent correlation with MRI-derived RV volumes (systolic: r = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.97; diastolic: r = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86–0.96), with intercepts of 2.5 ml (systolic) and 25.45 ml (diastolic) (Figure 2). The mean difference from MRI volumes was 0.1 ml (0.001%, SD ±13.3) for systolic and 5.2 ml (3%, SD ±28.2) for diastolic volume. Based on root mean square error (RMSE)—considered the most appropriate metric of model fit under linear assumptions—CBF outperformed the ellipsoidal shell model (RMSE 13.2/28.4 ml vs. 20.8/52.6 ml, systolic/diastolic) and the truncated cone model (RMSE 25.1/42.3 ml, systolic/diastolic) (Figure 3). These findings held true even in patients with RV enlargement (mean RVEDVi: 98.6 ml/m2) Conclusion: Our method shows excellent alignment with the data, as indicated by the low y-axis intercept and RSME, while maintaining strong correlation with MRI measurements. It offers an accurate and rapid method for bedside assessment of RV volume, enhancing prompt and precise clinical decision-making.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.