Entry‐Encouraging Vertical Integration

ABSTRACT It is well established that a vertically integrated firm may have an incentive to raise its rivals' costs by increasing the wholesale price of inputs. We show that this incentive can lead vertical integration to facilitate entry into the downstream market: higher input costs weaken incumbent rivals, thereby improving the entrant's competitive position. Our framework considers an upstream firm that offers observable two‐part tariff contracts to downstream firms. The downstream market consists of two incumbents and one potential entrant, with competition modeled à la Cournot. In addition, downstream firms may also source inputs from an alternative, less efficient supplier. We fully characterize the conditions under which entry‐encouraging vertical integration is profitable and arises in equilibrium, and demonstrate that in most cases it enhances overall welfare. By contrast, we also identify a (small) region where vertical integration reduces the entrant's profits and deters entry. In such cases, vertical integration is always detrimental to welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.70013
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Entry‐Encouraging Vertical Integration

Joel Sandonı́s, Ramon Faulı́-Oller
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Entry‐Encouraging Vertical Integration

Joel Sandonı́s, Ramon Faulı́-Oller
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT It is well established that a vertically integrated firm may have an incentive to raise its rivals' costs by increasing the wholesale price of inputs. We show that this incentive can lead vertical integration to facilitate entry into the downstream market: higher input costs weaken incumbent rivals, thereby improving the entrant's competitive position. Our framework considers an upstream firm that offers observable two‐part tariff contracts to downstream firms. The downstream market consists of two incumbents and one potential entrant, with competition modeled à la Cournot. In addition, downstream firms may also source inputs from an alternative, less efficient supplier. We fully characterize the conditions under which entry‐encouraging vertical integration is profitable and arises in equilibrium, and demonstrate that in most cases it enhances overall welfare. By contrast, we also identify a (small) region where vertical integration reduces the entrant's profits and deters entry. In such cases, vertical integration is always detrimental to welfare.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
University of Alicante (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.