Abstract Sat301: Plasma Glutamate, Early Neurological Risk Stratification, and Outcome: A Post-hoc Analysis of the PROTECT Trial

Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotics can reduce infections after acute brain injury; Ceftriaxone (CTX) also modulates glutamate (GLUT) transporter function, which may reduce excitotoxicity and improve neurological outcomes. No study has described blood GLUT concentration in humans after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Research Question: Is plasma GLUT associated with neurological outcome after OHCA? Goals/Aim: Assay plasma GLUT in a cohort of OHCA survivors randomized to CTX or placebo (PLAC) in the PROTECT trial (NCT04999592). Methods/Approach: Plasma GLUT concentrations were analyzed with the Promega bioluminescent assay from samples prospectively collected before study drug (baseline) and post-randomization days 1 and 3. Neurological risk was stratified blinded to outcome using the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) severity score iPhone app and the Vista EEG suppression ratio 6 hours after ROSC (SR6). Plasma GLUT was compared between PLAC and CTX groups and between CPC categories (1-2 = good outcome, 3-5 = poor) with the Mann-Whitney test. Stratification was compared with Area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (AUROC) curves. Results: PROTECT enrolled 52 subjects. Post-hoc stratification identified greater baseline neurological risk for subjects randomized to PLAC by SR6 (88 [63-96] vs 30 [3-84] CTX, p=0.008) but not by PCAC (4 [4-4] PLAC vs 4 [3-4] CTX, p=0.075). Poor neurological outcome was observed in 22/26 (85%) PLAC vs 13/26 (50%, p=0.018) CTX patients. The AUROC to predict poor neurological outcome was 0.93 (0.87-0.99) for SR6 vs 0.73 (0.57-0.89) for PCAC. Plasma GLUT was greater for the PLAC cohort at baseline (118.4 [87-180] vs 88.5 [69-103] µM, p=0.009) and on day 1 (102 [69-119] PLAC vs 70 [50-87] µM CTX, p=0.017). Change in GLUT from baseline to day 1 (p=0.68) or baseline to Day 3 (p=0.20) was similar in CTX and PLAC groups. Baseline (p=0.46), Day 1 (p=0.49), and Day 3 (p=0.99) plasma GLUT were similar among outcome groups. Conclusions: Subjects randomized to CTX had better neurological outcomes after OHCA, mainly related to lower baseline risk. Higher risk in the PLAC group was associated with higher baseline glutamate prior to study drug administration. Plasma GLUT did not differ between patients with good or poor outcome. More research is needed to assess glutamate dynamics beyond plasma levels after OHCA and to investigate the association between improved neurological outcomes and CTX.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.sat301
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sat301: Plasma Glutamate, Early Neurological Risk Stratification, and Outcome: A Post-hoc Analysis of the PROTECT Trial

Douglas B. Sawyer, Richard R. Riker, Sergey V. Ryzhov, Clifton W. Callaway et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sat301: Plasma Glutamate, Early Neurological Risk Stratification, and Outcome: A Post-hoc Analysis of the PROTECT Trial

Douglas B. Sawyer, Richard R. Riker, Sergey V. Ryzhov, Clifton W. Callaway, DAVID R. GAGNON, Alexandra Weissman, Joanne T. deKay, Teresa May, David B. Seder
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prophylactic antibiotics can reduce infections after acute brain injury; Ceftriaxone (CTX) also modulates glutamate (GLUT) transporter function, which may reduce excitotoxicity and improve neurological outcomes. No study has described blood GLUT concentration in humans after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Research Question: Is plasma GLUT associated with neurological outcome after OHCA? Goals/Aim: Assay plasma GLUT in a cohort of OHCA survivors randomized to CTX or placebo (PLAC) in the PROTECT trial (NCT04999592). Methods/Approach: Plasma GLUT concentrations were analyzed with the Promega bioluminescent assay from samples prospectively collected before study drug (baseline) and post-randomization days 1 and 3. Neurological risk was stratified blinded to outcome using the Pittsburgh Cardiac Arrest Category (PCAC) severity score iPhone app and the Vista EEG suppression ratio 6 hours after ROSC (SR6). Plasma GLUT was compared between PLAC and CTX groups and between CPC categories (1-2 = good outcome, 3-5 = poor) with the Mann-Whitney test. Stratification was compared with Area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (AUROC) curves. Results: PROTECT enrolled 52 subjects. Post-hoc stratification identified greater baseline neurological risk for subjects randomized to PLAC by SR6 (88 [63-96] vs 30 [3-84] CTX, p=0.008) but not by PCAC (4 [4-4] PLAC vs 4 [3-4] CTX, p=0.075). Poor neurological outcome was observed in 22/26 (85%) PLAC vs 13/26 (50%, p=0.018) CTX patients. The AUROC to predict poor neurological outcome was 0.93 (0.87-0.99) for SR6 vs 0.73 (0.57-0.89) for PCAC. Plasma GLUT was greater for the PLAC cohort at baseline (118.4 [87-180] vs 88.5 [69-103] µM, p=0.009) and on day 1 (102 [69-119] PLAC vs 70 [50-87] µM CTX, p=0.017). Change in GLUT from baseline to day 1 (p=0.68) or baseline to Day 3 (p=0.20) was similar in CTX and PLAC groups. Baseline (p=0.46), Day 1 (p=0.49), and Day 3 (p=0.99) plasma GLUT were similar among outcome groups. Conclusions: Subjects randomized to CTX had better neurological outcomes after OHCA, mainly related to lower baseline risk. Higher risk in the PLAC group was associated with higher baseline glutamate prior to study drug administration. Plasma GLUT did not differ between patients with good or poor outcome. More research is needed to assess glutamate dynamics beyond plasma levels after OHCA and to investigate the association between improved neurological outcomes and CTX.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Pittsburgh (US), MaineHealth (US), Maine Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.