Abstract 4367146: Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Accuracy in Iran: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Introduction/Background: Coronary artery Calcium Scoring (CACS) has been recognized as a risk predictor of major cardiovascular events in high income countries. However, more research is needed on the applicability of CACS in countries with developing economies. Research Questions/Hypothesis: In this meta-analysis, we examine the prevalence of CAC and the diagnostic performance of CACS when compared to conventional or CT coronary angiography in Iran. Methods/Approach: The authors searched the PubMed, SCOPUS, and World of Science databases for peer-reviewed studies evaluating populations in Iran between 2010-2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We examined the relationship between CACS and obstructive (≥50% stenosis) coronary artery disease as diagnosed by CT or conventional coronary angiography. Results/Data: A total of 11 studies were included for a total of 7095 patients. Mean age was 57 ± 13.21, 61% male. Risk factors included hypertension (38.8%), hypercholesterolemia (38.7%), smoking, (24.7%) and/or diabetes (23.6%). All studies except one (90.9%) included patients with an intermediate pretest probability of cardiovascular disease. All studies except one (90.9%) used CT scanners with ≥ 64 detector rows. The pooled prevalence of CAC>0 was 56.3% (95% CI 47.9%-64.7%). 3039/7095 patients (43.1%, 95% CI 33.5-52.6) had CACS of 0. When compared to angiography results, of six studies with reported data, 33.5% (95%CI=13.6-53.4) of patients had no coronary artery stenosis. Of five studies reporting data, 50.2% (95%CI=32.3-68) of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. Using angiography results as the gold standard, the pooled (random-effects model) negative predictive value (NPV) from five studies was 0.929 (95%CI=0.63-0.99). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were 0.921 (95%CI=0.876-0.966), 0.667 (95%CI=0.566-0.767), and 0.82 (95%CI=0.76-0.881). Overall heterogeneity was high (I2>75%) and study bias was moderate (Newcastle-Ottawa scale score mean 7.18). Conclusion: Among patients with at least an intermediate pretest probability of cardiovascular disease in Iran, prevalence of CACS=0 was similar to previously published studies in high income countries. However, pooled NPV was lower while pooled PPV was higher than previously published. Additional research is needed on understanding why pooled NPV and PPV vary from high income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367146
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367146: Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Accuracy in Iran: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Ismail Kabakus, Gilberto J. Aquino, Shannon Zhou, Jeremy R. Burt et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4367146: Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Accuracy in Iran: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Ismail Kabakus, Gilberto J. Aquino, Shannon Zhou, Jeremy R. Burt, Naim Qaqish, Aryan Zahergivar, Anna P. Newman, Bayarbaatar Bold, Reham Ellesy, Anujin Baljinnyam
article en

Abstract

Introduction/Background: Coronary artery Calcium Scoring (CACS) has been recognized as a risk predictor of major cardiovascular events in high income countries. However, more research is needed on the applicability of CACS in countries with developing economies. Research Questions/Hypothesis: In this meta-analysis, we examine the prevalence of CAC and the diagnostic performance of CACS when compared to conventional or CT coronary angiography in Iran. Methods/Approach: The authors searched the PubMed, SCOPUS, and World of Science databases for peer-reviewed studies evaluating populations in Iran between 2010-2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We examined the relationship between CACS and obstructive (≥50% stenosis) coronary artery disease as diagnosed by CT or conventional coronary angiography. Results/Data: A total of 11 studies were included for a total of 7095 patients. Mean age was 57 ± 13.21, 61% male. Risk factors included hypertension (38.8%), hypercholesterolemia (38.7%), smoking, (24.7%) and/or diabetes (23.6%). All studies except one (90.9%) included patients with an intermediate pretest probability of cardiovascular disease. All studies except one (90.9%) used CT scanners with ≥ 64 detector rows. The pooled prevalence of CAC>0 was 56.3% (95% CI 47.9%-64.7%). 3039/7095 patients (43.1%, 95% CI 33.5-52.6) had CACS of 0. When compared to angiography results, of six studies with reported data, 33.5% (95%CI=13.6-53.4) of patients had no coronary artery stenosis. Of five studies reporting data, 50.2% (95%CI=32.3-68) of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. Using angiography results as the gold standard, the pooled (random-effects model) negative predictive value (NPV) from five studies was 0.929 (95%CI=0.63-0.99). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were 0.921 (95%CI=0.876-0.966), 0.667 (95%CI=0.566-0.767), and 0.82 (95%CI=0.76-0.881). Overall heterogeneity was high (I2>75%) and study bias was moderate (Newcastle-Ottawa scale score mean 7.18). Conclusion: Among patients with at least an intermediate pretest probability of cardiovascular disease in Iran, prevalence of CACS=0 was similar to previously published studies in high income countries. However, pooled NPV was lower while pooled PPV was higher than previously published. Additional research is needed on understanding why pooled NPV and PPV vary from high income countries.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), George Washington University (US), University of Utah (US), Saginaw Chippewa Tribal College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.