Abstract 4357798: Risk assessment in primary prevention: plaque matters most

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification in primary prevention involves risk factor-based calculators. Subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) disease burden represents an individualized signature of cumulative risk factor exposure and may be undervalued in traditional assessment. Research Questions: How do risk calculators perform for predicting SA surrogates in healthy participants? Can a simplified risk score incorporating SA burden compete with conventional risk factor-based calculators? Methods: Asymptomatic participants in the Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) and BioImage cohorts underwent assessment of ultrasound (US) plaque presence/progression and coronary artery calcium (CAC) presence, which were analyzed as binary surrogate outcomes of atherosclerosis. The performance of various calculators was compared using C-statistics in each cohort overall, by sex, and by age tertiles. A simplified novel risk score utilizing age, sex, and US plaque burden was developed in the BioImage cohort for predicting 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization). Comparisons were drawn with established risk scores using C-statistics. Results: The cohorts had distinct characteristics (PESA n=3588, median age 46 years, 36% female; BioImage n=6011, median age 69 years, 57% female). All scores were moderately accurate for SA presence by US and CAC, though performance diminished with age (see Table). Scores were less accurate for predicting SA progression in either cohort. In the BioImage cohort, 473 MACE were observed at 5 years. Estimates of 5-year risk increased with age, with increasing baseline plaque burden, and with male sex (see Figure). Performance of the novel calculator using only age, sex, and plaque burden was significantly better than traditional risk factor-based scores (C-statistic 0.667, see Table). Conclusion: In two large cohorts of healthy participants with distinct age ranges, risk factor-based calculators predict SA surrogates with similar accuracy to their prediction of cardiovascular outcomes. A novel simplified score derived from 3 variables (age, sex, plaque burden) outperformed several contemporary risk factor-based calculators. Incorporating SA burden may improve a precision medicine approach to the primary prevention of CVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4357798
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4357798: Risk assessment in primary prevention: plaque matters most

Michael D. Shapiro, Stuart Pocock, Borja Ibáñez, Ana Devesa et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4357798: Risk assessment in primary prevention: plaque matters most

Michael D. Shapiro, Stuart Pocock, Borja Ibáñez, Ana Devesa, Carlos Galán, Warren Skoza, Inés García‐Lunar, Javier Sánchez‐Gonzalez, Valentı́n Fuster, Sadiya S. Khan, Ana García Álvarez, D. R. Fraser Taylor, Belen de Cortes Oliva Pellicer
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification in primary prevention involves risk factor-based calculators. Subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) disease burden represents an individualized signature of cumulative risk factor exposure and may be undervalued in traditional assessment. Research Questions: How do risk calculators perform for predicting SA surrogates in healthy participants? Can a simplified risk score incorporating SA burden compete with conventional risk factor-based calculators? Methods: Asymptomatic participants in the Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) and BioImage cohorts underwent assessment of ultrasound (US) plaque presence/progression and coronary artery calcium (CAC) presence, which were analyzed as binary surrogate outcomes of atherosclerosis. The performance of various calculators was compared using C-statistics in each cohort overall, by sex, and by age tertiles. A simplified novel risk score utilizing age, sex, and US plaque burden was developed in the BioImage cohort for predicting 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization). Comparisons were drawn with established risk scores using C-statistics. Results: The cohorts had distinct characteristics (PESA n=3588, median age 46 years, 36% female; BioImage n=6011, median age 69 years, 57% female). All scores were moderately accurate for SA presence by US and CAC, though performance diminished with age (see Table). Scores were less accurate for predicting SA progression in either cohort. In the BioImage cohort, 473 MACE were observed at 5 years. Estimates of 5-year risk increased with age, with increasing baseline plaque burden, and with male sex (see Figure). Performance of the novel calculator using only age, sex, and plaque burden was significantly better than traditional risk factor-based scores (C-statistic 0.667, see Table). Conclusion: In two large cohorts of healthy participants with distinct age ranges, risk factor-based calculators predict SA surrogates with similar accuracy to their prediction of cardiovascular outcomes. A novel simplified score derived from 3 variables (age, sex, plaque burden) outperformed several contemporary risk factor-based calculators. Incorporating SA burden may improve a precision medicine approach to the primary prevention of CVD.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwestern University (US), Spanish National Centre for Cardiovascular Research (ES), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Philips (Spain) (ES), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.