Abstract 4367136: CAR-T Therapies Associated with Higher CRS-Linked Cardiotoxicity Signal than BiTE Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Adverse Event Report

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies are T-cell engaging treatments with expanding indications in hematologic malignancies, particularly relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). BiTE agents are also under investigation for first line use and solid tumors. While their efficacy is established, immune-related adverse events (AEs), especially cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and downstream cardiovascular effects, pose clinical challenges. The cardiovascular sequelae of CRS remain under-characterized, with limited comparative data across therapies. Methods: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was queried for AEs linked to five MM-approved immunotherapies: idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (CAR-Ts); teclistamab, talquetamab, and elranatamab (BiTEs). Reports were filtered by “plasma cell myeloma” and the AE term “cytokine release syndrome”. Disproportionality metrics including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian information component were calculated for each drug and pooled by class. Significance was assessed via log(ROR) comparison. Results: Of 45,285 MM-related AEs, 1,379 (3.0%) were CRS. RORs were highest for idecabtagene (65.7; 55.9–76.9), followed by ciltacabtagene (11.1; 9.29–13.29). BiTE agents showed lower RORs: teclistamab (8.59; 7.42–9.95), talquetamab (6.93; 5.3–9.04), and elranatamab (6.15; 4.77–7.93). Pooled RORs demonstrated a ~3.9-fold higher CRS signal with CAR-Ts (29.9; 26.5–33.6) than BiTEs (7.71; 6.87–8.64; p < 0.00001). Pooled Bayesian values further confirmed this disparity: CAR-T (3.73; 3.37–4.14) vs. BiTEs (2.52; 2.25–2.82). Conclusion: CAR-T therapies exhibit significantly higher CRS pharmacovigilance signals than BiTE agents in MM, suggesting higher cardiotoxic potential. These findings support CV risk stratification in treatment selection and underscore the need for prospective cardio-oncology registries to validate real-world toxicity patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367136
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367136: CAR-T Therapies Associated with Higher CRS-Linked Cardiotoxicity Signal than BiTE Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Adverse Event Report

Tanesh Ayyalu, Allen J. Taylor, Zachary R Spahr, Adarshvardhan Tangella
Circulation
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Abstract 4367136: CAR-T Therapies Associated with Higher CRS-Linked Cardiotoxicity Signal than BiTE Agents in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Adverse Event Report

Tanesh Ayyalu, Allen J. Taylor, Zachary R Spahr, Adarshvardhan Tangella
article en

Abstract

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) therapies are T-cell engaging treatments with expanding indications in hematologic malignancies, particularly relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). BiTE agents are also under investigation for first line use and solid tumors. While their efficacy is established, immune-related adverse events (AEs), especially cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and downstream cardiovascular effects, pose clinical challenges. The cardiovascular sequelae of CRS remain under-characterized, with limited comparative data across therapies. Methods: The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was queried for AEs linked to five MM-approved immunotherapies: idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (CAR-Ts); teclistamab, talquetamab, and elranatamab (BiTEs). Reports were filtered by “plasma cell myeloma” and the AE term “cytokine release syndrome”. Disproportionality metrics including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian information component were calculated for each drug and pooled by class. Significance was assessed via log(ROR) comparison. Results: Of 45,285 MM-related AEs, 1,379 (3.0%) were CRS. RORs were highest for idecabtagene (65.7; 55.9–76.9), followed by ciltacabtagene (11.1; 9.29–13.29). BiTE agents showed lower RORs: teclistamab (8.59; 7.42–9.95), talquetamab (6.93; 5.3–9.04), and elranatamab (6.15; 4.77–7.93). Pooled RORs demonstrated a ~3.9-fold higher CRS signal with CAR-Ts (29.9; 26.5–33.6) than BiTEs (7.71; 6.87–8.64; p < 0.00001). Pooled Bayesian values further confirmed this disparity: CAR-T (3.73; 3.37–4.14) vs. BiTEs (2.52; 2.25–2.82). Conclusion: CAR-T therapies exhibit significantly higher CRS pharmacovigilance signals than BiTE agents in MM, suggesting higher cardiotoxic potential. These findings support CV risk stratification in treatment selection and underscore the need for prospective cardio-oncology registries to validate real-world toxicity patterns.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US), Georgetown University (US), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.