Abstract 4370759: Bariatric Surgery vs. GLP/GIP Agonists: A Real-World Comparative Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Over 2 Million Patients.

This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Research Network, comprising real-time electronic medical records from over 100 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) treated between 2021 and 2024 were included if they underwent bariatric surgery or received a GLP/GIP agonist (tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, or dulaglutide). Patients exposed to both interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1, greedy nearest neighbor) was used to balance covariates between groups. The analytic window spanned from 90 to 1,095 days post-index. Patients with a prior history of each outcome were excluded. Primary outcomes included mortality, atrial fibrillation (Afib), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were calculated for each endpoint. Results: The final matched cohorts included 135,863 bariatric patients and 2,070,839 GLP/GIP-treated patients. Bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality (RR 0.561, 95% CI: 0.524–0.600, p < 0.001), Afib (RR 0.892, 95% CI: 0.828–0.960, p = 0.002), MI (RR 0.605, 95% CI: 0.536–0.684, p < 0.001), and HF (RR 0.578, 95% CI: 0.531–0.630, p < 0.001). Stroke risk was also significantly lower (RR 0.863, 95% CI: 0.801–0.930, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses confirmed improved event-free survival in the bariatric cohort across all outcomes. Notably, hazard ratios mirrored these findings, with mortality HR 0.365 ( p < 0.001), HF HR 0.440 ( p < 0.001), and MI HR 0.553 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large real-world analysis, bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risks of death, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke compared to GLP/GIP therapy. These results reinforce the profound cardiometabolic benefits of bariatric surgery and highlight its value as a preferred intervention in eligible patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370759
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370759: Bariatric Surgery vs. GLP/GIP Agonists: A Real-World Comparative Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Over 2 Million Patients.

Endurance O Evbayekha, Oluwamisimi Mary Abib
Circulation
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4370759: Bariatric Surgery vs. GLP/GIP Agonists: A Real-World Comparative Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Over 2 Million Patients.

Endurance O Evbayekha, Oluwamisimi Mary Abib
article en

Abstract

This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX Research Network, comprising real-time electronic medical records from over 100 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) treated between 2021 and 2024 were included if they underwent bariatric surgery or received a GLP/GIP agonist (tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, or dulaglutide). Patients exposed to both interventions were excluded. Propensity score matching (1:1, greedy nearest neighbor) was used to balance covariates between groups. The analytic window spanned from 90 to 1,095 days post-index. Patients with a prior history of each outcome were excluded. Primary outcomes included mortality, atrial fibrillation (Afib), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and stroke. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were calculated for each endpoint. Results: The final matched cohorts included 135,863 bariatric patients and 2,070,839 GLP/GIP-treated patients. Bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risk of mortality (RR 0.561, 95% CI: 0.524–0.600, p < 0.001), Afib (RR 0.892, 95% CI: 0.828–0.960, p = 0.002), MI (RR 0.605, 95% CI: 0.536–0.684, p < 0.001), and HF (RR 0.578, 95% CI: 0.531–0.630, p < 0.001). Stroke risk was also significantly lower (RR 0.863, 95% CI: 0.801–0.930, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses confirmed improved event-free survival in the bariatric cohort across all outcomes. Notably, hazard ratios mirrored these findings, with mortality HR 0.365 ( p < 0.001), HF HR 0.440 ( p < 0.001), and MI HR 0.553 ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large real-world analysis, bariatric surgery was associated with significantly lower risks of death, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke compared to GLP/GIP therapy. These results reinforce the profound cardiometabolic benefits of bariatric surgery and highlight its value as a preferred intervention in eligible patients at high cardiovascular risk.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Piedmont Athens Regional (US), St. Luke's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.