Abstract 4369748: Race Differences in Acute Chest Pain Care in a Multisite U.S. Cohort

Introduction: Race-based differences in cardiovascular care are well described. However, data examining differences in cardiac testing and death or myocardial infarction (MI) rates among U.S. emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain by race are limited. Research Question: Do safety and healthcare utilization differ by race among patients with chest pain in a multisite U.S. ED cohort? Methods: We conducted a multisite observational study using the Wake Forest Chest Pain Registry, including patients ≥18 years old who were evaluated for possible acute coronary syndrome from 1/1/2021–12/31/2021 across 25 EDs. Each ED used the same high-sensitivity troponin protocol for chest pain evaluations. Race was determined by patient self-report in the electronic health record and reported as White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic, and Other. The primary safety outcome was 30-day all-cause death or MI. Healthcare utilization outcomes included 30-day hospitalizations and objective cardiac testing (OCT), which was defined as non-invasive testing (NIT: stress testing and coronary computed tomography angiography) and invasive coronary angiography. Outcomes between races were compared using chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between race and outcomes adjusting for sex, age, obesity, smoking, rurality, prior coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insurance status, ED site, and initial troponin, with White race as the reference group. Results: Among 40979 patients, 58.7% were White, 32.9% Black, 5.4% Hispanic, and 3.0% Other. At 30 days, death or MI occurred in 4.6% (1,097/24063) of White patients compared to 2.2% (301/13480) of Black and 1.6% (36/2195) of Hispanic patients (p<0.001). Compared to White patients, the odds of 30-day death or MI were lower among Black (aOR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.43-0.60) and Hispanic (aOR 0.65, 95%CI: 0.44-0.97) patients. OCT at 30 days occurred in 19.8% (4756/24063) of White, 13.1% (1765/13480) of Black, and 10.7% (234/2195) of Hispanic patients (p<0.001). Compared to White patients, after adjusting for confounders, the odds of 30-day OCT were lower among Black (aOR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.68-0.78) and Hispanic (aOR 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71-0.97) patients. Table 1 describes OCT and hospitalization rates by race. Conclusion: Black and Hispanic patients with chest pain had lower rates of 30-day death or MI and OCT compared to White patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369748
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369748: Race Differences in Acute Chest Pain Care in a Multisite U.S. Cohort

Simon A. Mahler, Anna C. Snavely, Michael R. Higgins, Kyle H. McKnight et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4369748: Race Differences in Acute Chest Pain Care in a Multisite U.S. Cohort

Simon A. Mahler, Anna C. Snavely, Michael R. Higgins, Kyle H. McKnight, Michael Supples, David R. Pearson, Brian Hutchison, Nicklaus P. Ashburn, Richard Jean-Louis, Lyle Paukner
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Race-based differences in cardiovascular care are well described. However, data examining differences in cardiac testing and death or myocardial infarction (MI) rates among U.S. emergency department (ED) patients with acute chest pain by race are limited. Research Question: Do safety and healthcare utilization differ by race among patients with chest pain in a multisite U.S. ED cohort? Methods: We conducted a multisite observational study using the Wake Forest Chest Pain Registry, including patients ≥18 years old who were evaluated for possible acute coronary syndrome from 1/1/2021–12/31/2021 across 25 EDs. Each ED used the same high-sensitivity troponin protocol for chest pain evaluations. Race was determined by patient self-report in the electronic health record and reported as White non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic, Hispanic, and Other. The primary safety outcome was 30-day all-cause death or MI. Healthcare utilization outcomes included 30-day hospitalizations and objective cardiac testing (OCT), which was defined as non-invasive testing (NIT: stress testing and coronary computed tomography angiography) and invasive coronary angiography. Outcomes between races were compared using chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between race and outcomes adjusting for sex, age, obesity, smoking, rurality, prior coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insurance status, ED site, and initial troponin, with White race as the reference group. Results: Among 40979 patients, 58.7% were White, 32.9% Black, 5.4% Hispanic, and 3.0% Other. At 30 days, death or MI occurred in 4.6% (1,097/24063) of White patients compared to 2.2% (301/13480) of Black and 1.6% (36/2195) of Hispanic patients (p<0.001). Compared to White patients, the odds of 30-day death or MI were lower among Black (aOR 0.51, 95%CI: 0.43-0.60) and Hispanic (aOR 0.65, 95%CI: 0.44-0.97) patients. OCT at 30 days occurred in 19.8% (4756/24063) of White, 13.1% (1765/13480) of Black, and 10.7% (234/2195) of Hispanic patients (p<0.001). Compared to White patients, after adjusting for confounders, the odds of 30-day OCT were lower among Black (aOR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.68-0.78) and Hispanic (aOR 0.83, 95%CI: 0.71-0.97) patients. Table 1 describes OCT and hospitalization rates by race. Conclusion: Black and Hispanic patients with chest pain had lower rates of 30-day death or MI and OCT compared to White patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Carolinas Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.