Divided Opposition: Resource Asymmetry, Elections, and Protests in Electoral Autocracies

Despite calls for strategic unity against authoritarian incumbents, opposition parties often struggle to coordinate on a shared strategy. Why? This article builds on existing scholarship by introducing two additional drivers of opposition fragmentation. First, we argue that resource asymmetry (financial, organizational, leadership disparities) fosters distrust and competition rather than cooperation within the opposition. Second, we show how extraordinary times—high-pressure moments such as protests or elections—serve as stress tests for strategic alignment, and ultimately drive fragmentation. While typically seen as opportunities to mobilize society against authoritarian regimes, these moments often reveal, deepen, or generate divisions among the opposition. Our theory is grounded in a comparative study of Venezuela under chavismo and Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdogan. We draw on archival research, process tracing, and original interview data collected during iterative fieldwork in Spain, Turkey, and Venezuela between 2014-2024 to substantiate our argument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251379684
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divided Opposition: Resource Asymmetry, Elections, and Protests in Electoral Autocracies

Jonas Bergan Draege, Maryhen Jiménez
Political Studies
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Divided Opposition: Resource Asymmetry, Elections, and Protests in Electoral Autocracies

Jonas Bergan Draege, Maryhen Jiménez
article en

Abstract

Despite calls for strategic unity against authoritarian incumbents, opposition parties often struggle to coordinate on a shared strategy. Why? This article builds on existing scholarship by introducing two additional drivers of opposition fragmentation. First, we argue that resource asymmetry (financial, organizational, leadership disparities) fosters distrust and competition rather than cooperation within the opposition. Second, we show how extraordinary times—high-pressure moments such as protests or elections—serve as stress tests for strategic alignment, and ultimately drive fragmentation. While typically seen as opportunities to mobilize society against authoritarian regimes, these moments often reveal, deepen, or generate divisions among the opposition. Our theory is grounded in a comparative study of Venezuela under chavismo and Turkey under Recep Tayyip Erdogan. We draw on archival research, process tracing, and original interview data collected during iterative fieldwork in Spain, Turkey, and Venezuela between 2014-2024 to substantiate our argument.

Political Studies
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.