Abstract 4370743: Sex Differences in Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes in Adults with Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease Compared to Controls

Background: Adults with moderate-to-complex congenital heart disease (CHD) show psychosocial and neurocognitive deficits, particularly in mood, anxiety, and cognitive domains. However, sex differences in neuropsychological outcomes remain underexplored. Objective: To examine sex-based differences in cognitive and psychosocial outcomes in adults with CHD compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Methods: 80 adults (20 female CHD, 20 male CHD, 20 female controls, 20 males controls) were recruited. Cognitive tests were administered (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence [WASI-II]) and questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, and perceived social support were completed. Group comparisons were completed using independent samples t-tests, and the relationships between psychosocial and cognitive variables were examined using Pearson correlations. Results: The CHD group showed significantly worse neurocognitive performance in multiple domains (visuospatial/executive function (VISEXEC), attention, language, WASI-II full-scale IQ, verbal comprehension (VCI), perceptual reasoning (PRI) subscales), and higher anxiety and depression scores compared to controls (all p values < .030). The male CHD group performed significantly worse on the MoCA (p < .001), VISEXEC (p < .001), VCI (p = .05), PRI (p < .001), full-scale IQ (p = .002), and reported greater anxiety, depression, and lower social support (p = .049) compared to male controls. The female CHD group had significantly lower scores on the MoCA (p = .003), executive function (p = .001), attention (p = .002), WASI-II subtasks matrix reasoning (p < .001), vocabulary (p = .006), block design (p = .007), with no differences found in psychosocial measures compared to controls. In correlational analyses, among males with CHD, greater social support was associated with better executive function (r = 0.49, p < .03). Conclusions: Sex differences in adults with CHD are apparent in some cognitive and psychosocial domains compared to controls. Findings highlight the significance of social support and its association with executive function in adult males with CHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370743
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370743: Sex Differences in Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes in Adults with Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease Compared to Controls

Nancy A. Pike, Jamil Aboulhosn, Holli A. DeVon, Cristina Cabrera‐Mino et al.
Circulation
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

Abstract 4370743: Sex Differences in Cognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes in Adults with Moderate to Complex Congenital Heart Disease Compared to Controls

Nancy A. Pike, Jamil Aboulhosn, Holli A. DeVon, Cristina Cabrera‐Mino, Kristen R. Choi, Mary-Lynn Brecht
article en

Abstract

Background: Adults with moderate-to-complex congenital heart disease (CHD) show psychosocial and neurocognitive deficits, particularly in mood, anxiety, and cognitive domains. However, sex differences in neuropsychological outcomes remain underexplored. Objective: To examine sex-based differences in cognitive and psychosocial outcomes in adults with CHD compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Methods: 80 adults (20 female CHD, 20 male CHD, 20 female controls, 20 males controls) were recruited. Cognitive tests were administered (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence [WASI-II]) and questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, and perceived social support were completed. Group comparisons were completed using independent samples t-tests, and the relationships between psychosocial and cognitive variables were examined using Pearson correlations. Results: The CHD group showed significantly worse neurocognitive performance in multiple domains (visuospatial/executive function (VISEXEC), attention, language, WASI-II full-scale IQ, verbal comprehension (VCI), perceptual reasoning (PRI) subscales), and higher anxiety and depression scores compared to controls (all p values < .030). The male CHD group performed significantly worse on the MoCA (p < .001), VISEXEC (p < .001), VCI (p = .05), PRI (p < .001), full-scale IQ (p = .002), and reported greater anxiety, depression, and lower social support (p = .049) compared to male controls. The female CHD group had significantly lower scores on the MoCA (p = .003), executive function (p = .001), attention (p = .002), WASI-II subtasks matrix reasoning (p < .001), vocabulary (p = .006), block design (p = .007), with no differences found in psychosocial measures compared to controls. In correlational analyses, among males with CHD, greater social support was associated with better executive function (r = 0.49, p < .03). Conclusions: Sex differences in adults with CHD are apparent in some cognitive and psychosocial domains compared to controls. Findings highlight the significance of social support and its association with executive function in adult males with CHD.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
UCLA Health (US), Lake County Forest Preserves (US), UtopiaCompression (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.