Abstract 4364062: Urban-Rural Differences in Life’s Essential 8: Results from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Background: Rural populations in the United States face shorter life expectancies and higher cardiovascular mortality compared to urban populations. Understanding how the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) metrics vary across urban and rural populations may assist in designing interventions to address cardiovascular health (CVH) among rural adults. Hypothesis: We hypothesized rural adults would have worse CVH, as measured by LE8, compared to urban and suburban adults. Methods: REGARDS is a national cohort of Black and White adults age 45 and older, enrolled from 2003-7. Data from participants who completed the home visit (2013–2016) and were not missing data on LE8 metrics were used for the present analysis. LE8 metrics were assessed through questionnaires, physical measurements, and lab data. The 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA-7) codes were used to classify population density. Mean LE8 scores and individual metrics were examined across 7 RUCA classes ( isolated rural, other small rural, small rural core, other large rural, large rural core, other urban, and urban core ), using general linear modeling, adjusting for demographic characteristics, income, and education. Results: A total of 8,162 REGARDS participants were included in the present analysis. The majority resided in Urban Core areas (73.6%). REGARDS participants' distribution across the RUCA class was similar to the US Census data. (Table 1) Adjusting for demographic factors, LE8 scores increased with increasing urbanicity, with Other Small Rural and Isolated Rural areas having the lowest LE8 scores. Modest attenuation was observed after further adjustment for education and income. (Figure 1) No interactions by race or sex were observed. Individual LE8 metrics for diet, blood pressure, and blood glucose demonstrated similar trends across RUCA class, with improved metrics associated with increased urbanicity. Metrics for lipids, sleep, and smoking metrics did not differ by RUCA class. Conclusion: In this large cohort of adults from 48 contiguous US states, higher urbanicity was associated with higher mean LE8 scores, reflecting better CVH. This association with improved CVH was driven by better diet, blood pressure, and blood glucose scores. Understanding population-level differences in CVH across the country will inform the development of interventions to address poor CVH in rural populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364062
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364062: Urban-Rural Differences in Life’s Essential 8: Results from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Mary Cushman, Matthew Shane Loop, Elizabeth A. Jackson, Debora Kamin Mukaz et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4364062: Urban-Rural Differences in Life’s Essential 8: Results from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Mary Cushman, Matthew Shane Loop, Elizabeth A. Jackson, Debora Kamin Mukaz, Virginia J. Howard, George Howard, Raymond C. F. Jones, P Bhargava, Suzanne Judd, Ya Yuan
article en

Abstract

Background: Rural populations in the United States face shorter life expectancies and higher cardiovascular mortality compared to urban populations. Understanding how the American Heart Association’s Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) metrics vary across urban and rural populations may assist in designing interventions to address cardiovascular health (CVH) among rural adults. Hypothesis: We hypothesized rural adults would have worse CVH, as measured by LE8, compared to urban and suburban adults. Methods: REGARDS is a national cohort of Black and White adults age 45 and older, enrolled from 2003-7. Data from participants who completed the home visit (2013–2016) and were not missing data on LE8 metrics were used for the present analysis. LE8 metrics were assessed through questionnaires, physical measurements, and lab data. The 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA-7) codes were used to classify population density. Mean LE8 scores and individual metrics were examined across 7 RUCA classes ( isolated rural, other small rural, small rural core, other large rural, large rural core, other urban, and urban core ), using general linear modeling, adjusting for demographic characteristics, income, and education. Results: A total of 8,162 REGARDS participants were included in the present analysis. The majority resided in Urban Core areas (73.6%). REGARDS participants' distribution across the RUCA class was similar to the US Census data. (Table 1) Adjusting for demographic factors, LE8 scores increased with increasing urbanicity, with Other Small Rural and Isolated Rural areas having the lowest LE8 scores. Modest attenuation was observed after further adjustment for education and income. (Figure 1) No interactions by race or sex were observed. Individual LE8 metrics for diet, blood pressure, and blood glucose demonstrated similar trends across RUCA class, with improved metrics associated with increased urbanicity. Metrics for lipids, sleep, and smoking metrics did not differ by RUCA class. Conclusion: In this large cohort of adults from 48 contiguous US states, higher urbanicity was associated with higher mean LE8 scores, reflecting better CVH. This association with improved CVH was driven by better diet, blood pressure, and blood glucose scores. Understanding population-level differences in CVH across the country will inform the development of interventions to address poor CVH in rural populations.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of Vermont (US), Alabama Department of Public Health (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.