Abstract 4366664: Impact of the Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Distribution Differences Between Lipid Fractions

Background: Diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia relies on laboratory assessment of lipid parameters. This study aimed to evaluate differences in the distribution of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations according to the presence and type of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who had at least one measurement of LDL-C, apoB, and non-HDL-C between March and November 2024 in a high-volume tertiary hospital. All lipid fractions were expressed as percentages of measurements above and below cut-off values established by the recent ESC guidelines. Subgroup analysis based on the LLT type was performed, with patients divided into either single or combined LLT. Results: A total of 5 047 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients on LLT, most received statin monotherapy (77.3%), predominantly atorvastatin. Combined therapy, primarily statin plus ezetimibe, was used in 22.7% of treated patients. Discordance between on-target apoB levels and elevated LDL-C concentrations occurred in 26.6% of untreated patients, 13.6% of all LLT-treated patients, 15.1% of single LLT patients, and 8.6% of combined LLT patients. Similarly, discordance between on-target non-HDL-C and elevated LDL-C levels was observed in 13.5% of untreated patients, 7.5% of all LLT-treated patients, 8.4% of single LLT patients, and 4.8% of combined LLT patients. Conclusions: Classification of hyperlipidemia based on LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB concentrations reveals significant discrepancies between these markers, especially between LDL-C and apoB. LLT significantly reduces these discrepancies, with combined LLT being particularly effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366664
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366664: Impact of the Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Distribution Differences Between Lipid Fractions

Bożena Sosnowska, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Karolina Obońska, Piotr Adamski et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4366664: Impact of the Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Distribution Differences Between Lipid Fractions

Bożena Sosnowska, Klaudyna Grzelakowska, Karolina Obońska, Piotr Adamski, Krzysztof Chlebus, Przemysław Podhajski, Eliano Pio Navarese, Łukasz Szarpak, Piotr Niezgoda, Jakub Ratajczak, Alicja Rzepka-Cholasińska, Maciej Banach, Jacek Kryś, Julia M. Umińska, Ewa Laskowska, Małgorzata Ostrowska, Jacek Kubica, Magdalena Krintus, Marcin Ziółkowski, Grzegorz Skonieczny, Natalia Mrzywka, Małgorzata Topolska
article en

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia relies on laboratory assessment of lipid parameters. This study aimed to evaluate differences in the distribution of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations according to the presence and type of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who had at least one measurement of LDL-C, apoB, and non-HDL-C between March and November 2024 in a high-volume tertiary hospital. All lipid fractions were expressed as percentages of measurements above and below cut-off values established by the recent ESC guidelines. Subgroup analysis based on the LLT type was performed, with patients divided into either single or combined LLT. Results: A total of 5 047 patients were included in the analysis. Among patients on LLT, most received statin monotherapy (77.3%), predominantly atorvastatin. Combined therapy, primarily statin plus ezetimibe, was used in 22.7% of treated patients. Discordance between on-target apoB levels and elevated LDL-C concentrations occurred in 26.6% of untreated patients, 13.6% of all LLT-treated patients, 15.1% of single LLT patients, and 8.6% of combined LLT patients. Similarly, discordance between on-target non-HDL-C and elevated LDL-C levels was observed in 13.5% of untreated patients, 7.5% of all LLT-treated patients, 8.4% of single LLT patients, and 4.8% of combined LLT patients. Conclusions: Classification of hyperlipidemia based on LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB concentrations reveals significant discrepancies between these markers, especially between LDL-C and apoB. LLT significantly reduces these discrepancies, with combined LLT being particularly effective.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Jagiellonian University (PL), Polyclinic Medical Center (US), Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), University of Bydgoszcz (PL), Antoni Jurasz University Hospital (PL), Medical University of Lodz (PL), American Heart of Poland (PL), Stanisław Staszic University of Applied Sciences in Piła (PL), Polyclinic General Hospital (GR), Gdańsk Medical University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.