Abstract 4364005: Comparative Efficacy of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Cirrhotic Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Ticagrelor is a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor compared to clopidogrel and is commonly used in the treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), including after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, hepatic metabolism of these agents may be altered in patients with cirrhosis, and comparative clinical outcomes in this population remain underexplored. Research Questions: What are the cardiovascular and safety outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in cirrhotic patients with stable CAD following PCI? Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Global Collaborative Network TriNetX, including data from January 2015 to January 2025. Patients with cirrhosis and stable CAD who underwent PCI were identified and categorized based on receipt of ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and concomitant medications. Results: After matching, 1,591 patients were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Over a 3-year follow-up period, ticagrelor use was associated with a significantly higher risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.419, 95% CI: 1.252–1.607, P < 0.0001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 1.223, 95% CI: 1.112–1.344, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR 1.047, 95% CI: 0.924–1.187, P = 0.471), major bleeding (HR 0.927, 95% CI: 0.793–1.083, P = 0.3367), or stroke (HR 0.852, 95% CI: 0.676–1.074, P = 0.1756). Conclusion: In cirrhotic patients undergoing PCI for stable CAD, ticagrelor was unexpectedly associated with higher risks of acute MI and MACE compared to clopidogrel, without a corresponding increase in bleeding or mortality. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies to further investigate antiplatelet therapy choice in this unique population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364005
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364005: Comparative Efficacy of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Cirrhotic Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aman Amanullah, Maria Helena Siqueira Tavares de Melo, Thitiphan Srikulmontri, Thomas Stavola et al.
Circulation
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Abstract 4364005: Comparative Efficacy of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Cirrhotic Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aman Amanullah, Maria Helena Siqueira Tavares de Melo, Thitiphan Srikulmontri, Thomas Stavola, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Narathorn Kulthamrongsri, Riley Marotta, Suchanart Pantarote, Alexander Rembalsky
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Ticagrelor is a more potent P2Y12 inhibitor compared to clopidogrel and is commonly used in the treatment of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), including after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, hepatic metabolism of these agents may be altered in patients with cirrhosis, and comparative clinical outcomes in this population remain underexplored. Research Questions: What are the cardiovascular and safety outcomes of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in cirrhotic patients with stable CAD following PCI? Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Global Collaborative Network TriNetX, including data from January 2015 to January 2025. Patients with cirrhosis and stable CAD who underwent PCI were identified and categorized based on receipt of ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Propensity score matching was employed to balance baseline characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, and concomitant medications. Results: After matching, 1,591 patients were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Over a 3-year follow-up period, ticagrelor use was associated with a significantly higher risk of acute myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.419, 95% CI: 1.252–1.607, P < 0.0001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 1.223, 95% CI: 1.112–1.344, P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (HR 1.047, 95% CI: 0.924–1.187, P = 0.471), major bleeding (HR 0.927, 95% CI: 0.793–1.083, P = 0.3367), or stroke (HR 0.852, 95% CI: 0.676–1.074, P = 0.1756). Conclusion: In cirrhotic patients undergoing PCI for stable CAD, ticagrelor was unexpectedly associated with higher risks of acute MI and MACE compared to clopidogrel, without a corresponding increase in bleeding or mortality. These findings highlight the need for prospective studies to further investigate antiplatelet therapy choice in this unique population.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US), Queen's Medical Center (US), Jefferson College (US), Rangsit University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.