Abstract 4361819: Sex Differences in Response to Endurance Training

Background: Few studies have systematically evaluated whether adaptations to endurance training differ by sex. We assessed sex differences in cardiopulmonary, body composition, and metabolic adaptations among male and female sedentary adults following a 20-week endurance training program. Hypothesis: Male and female participants will demonstrate equal cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations in response to an identical dose of supervised endurance training. Methods: HERITAGE Family Study participants (56% female, mean age: 34 years) completed a supervised endurance training program, with cardiopulmonary exercise tests, body composition, and metabolic assessments performed at baseline (n=834) and after the training period (n=720). Two-sample t-tests were used to compare exercise responses among male and female participants. An external exercise training intervention study involving 149 individuals with abdominal adiposity (63% female, mean age: 52 years) was used for validation of training-related adaptations. Results: We observed sex differences in several (18/65) training-related adaptations in HERITAGE. Notably, while male participants exhibited higher VO2max at baseline (36 vs 27 ml/kg/min, p=5x10-49), female participants demonstrated greater improvements following the training intervention (+20 vs +16%, p=2x10-7). From a body composition and metabolic standpoint, male participants exhibited greater reductions in body fat percentage (-4 vs -2%, p=0.004) and visceral fat (-6 vs -2%, p=0.002), and a three-fold greater increase in insulin sensitivity (+17 vs +6%, p=0.009) compared to female participants. In the validation cohort, male participants also demonstrated greater training-related improvements in body mass index, waist circumference, and insulin/glucose responses to an oral glucose tolerance test. Conclusions: This study highlights important sex differences in adaptations to endurance training. Specifically, while female individuals demonstrated greater trainability in VO2max, male individuals exhibited larger improvements in body composition and glucose/insulin metabolism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4361819
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4361819: Sex Differences in Response to Endurance Training

Jeremy Robbins, Jennifer E. Ho, Jacob L. Barber, Eric C. Leszczynski et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4361819: Sex Differences in Response to Endurance Training

Jeremy Robbins, Jennifer E. Ho, Jacob L. Barber, Eric C. Leszczynski, Prashant Rao, Robert Ross, Laurie Farrell, Emily S. Lau, C. Edwards, Robert E. Gerszten, Clary B. Clish, Mark A. Sarzynski, Claude Bouchard, Prasun K Dev, Michael Mi, Kevin B. Jacobs, Sujoy Ghosh, Christian Peterson
article en

Abstract

Background: Few studies have systematically evaluated whether adaptations to endurance training differ by sex. We assessed sex differences in cardiopulmonary, body composition, and metabolic adaptations among male and female sedentary adults following a 20-week endurance training program. Hypothesis: Male and female participants will demonstrate equal cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations in response to an identical dose of supervised endurance training. Methods: HERITAGE Family Study participants (56% female, mean age: 34 years) completed a supervised endurance training program, with cardiopulmonary exercise tests, body composition, and metabolic assessments performed at baseline (n=834) and after the training period (n=720). Two-sample t-tests were used to compare exercise responses among male and female participants. An external exercise training intervention study involving 149 individuals with abdominal adiposity (63% female, mean age: 52 years) was used for validation of training-related adaptations. Results: We observed sex differences in several (18/65) training-related adaptations in HERITAGE. Notably, while male participants exhibited higher VO2max at baseline (36 vs 27 ml/kg/min, p=5x10-49), female participants demonstrated greater improvements following the training intervention (+20 vs +16%, p=2x10-7). From a body composition and metabolic standpoint, male participants exhibited greater reductions in body fat percentage (-4 vs -2%, p=0.004) and visceral fat (-6 vs -2%, p=0.002), and a three-fold greater increase in insulin sensitivity (+17 vs +6%, p=0.009) compared to female participants. In the validation cohort, male participants also demonstrated greater training-related improvements in body mass index, waist circumference, and insulin/glucose responses to an oral glucose tolerance test. Conclusions: This study highlights important sex differences in adaptations to endurance training. Specifically, while female individuals demonstrated greater trainability in VO2max, male individuals exhibited larger improvements in body composition and glucose/insulin metabolism.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Broad Institute (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of South Carolina (US), Queen's University (CA), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Chestnut Hill Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.