Abstract 4371273: Community Paramedic Home Visits for Heart Failure: Per-Protocol Analysis of the MIGHTy-Heart Trial

Background: Mobile Integrated Health (MIH) programs integrate nurse care coordination, community paramedic (CP) home visits, and telehealth visits with emergency medicine physicians. The MIGHTy-Heart pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial compared MIH to a transitions of care coordinator (TOCC), a nurse-led call 48–72 hours after discharge, among heart failure patients in 11 hospitals. In the trial, some patients randomized to MIH received a CP home visit while others did not, depending on clinical acuity and patient preference. This per-protocol analysis of the MIGHTy-Heart trial compares outcomes among patients randomized to MIH who received a CP home visit to patients randomized to TOCC. Methods: Of the 2003 patients enrolled, 998 were randomized to the TOCC arm and 1,005 to MIH, of which 382 (38%) received a CP home visit and did not crossover. Analyses compared MIH patients receiving a CP home visit (n=382) to TOCC (n=998). The co-primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause readmissions and change in health status measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Weighted logistic regression models examining readmissions adjusted for age, sex, race, marital status, comorbidity burden, previous hospital readmissions, and enrollment site. Multivariable linear regression models examining health status adjusted for the same covariates, plus baseline KCCQ score. In exploratory analyses, we tested treatment-by-age and treatment-by-sex interactions for each outcome. Results: The 2,003 patients’ mean age was 67.6 (standard deviation 13.7) years, 52% were female, 47% identified as Black or African American, and 27% as Hispanic. Few demographic differences existed between the arms (Table 1). In adjusted models, examining the interaction effect of sex and treatment on 30-day all-cause readmission, female MIH patients had 50% fewer odds of being readmitted compared to male MIH patients (p=0.01) (Table 2). In adjusted models, examining the interaction effect of age and treatment on 30-day health status, younger MIH patients scored, on average, 5.99 points higher than younger TOCC patients (p=0.03) (Table 3). Conclusions: Compared to patients in the TOCC arm, women and younger patients in the MIH arm who received a CP home visit had reduced readmissions and improved health status, respectively. These findings align with the intention-to-treat analyses (reported separately) and support tailoring MIH services to the patients most likely to benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371273
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371273: Community Paramedic Home Visits for Heart Failure: Per-Protocol Analysis of the MIGHTy-Heart Trial

Meghan Reading Turchioe, Ruth Masterson Creber, Leah Shafran Topaz, Jacky Choi et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4371273: Community Paramedic Home Visits for Heart Failure: Per-Protocol Analysis of the MIGHTy-Heart Trial

Meghan Reading Turchioe, Ruth Masterson Creber, Leah Shafran Topaz, Jacky Choi, Brock Daniels, Yihong Zhao, Melani Ellison
article en

Abstract

Background: Mobile Integrated Health (MIH) programs integrate nurse care coordination, community paramedic (CP) home visits, and telehealth visits with emergency medicine physicians. The MIGHTy-Heart pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial compared MIH to a transitions of care coordinator (TOCC), a nurse-led call 48–72 hours after discharge, among heart failure patients in 11 hospitals. In the trial, some patients randomized to MIH received a CP home visit while others did not, depending on clinical acuity and patient preference. This per-protocol analysis of the MIGHTy-Heart trial compares outcomes among patients randomized to MIH who received a CP home visit to patients randomized to TOCC. Methods: Of the 2003 patients enrolled, 998 were randomized to the TOCC arm and 1,005 to MIH, of which 382 (38%) received a CP home visit and did not crossover. Analyses compared MIH patients receiving a CP home visit (n=382) to TOCC (n=998). The co-primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause readmissions and change in health status measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Weighted logistic regression models examining readmissions adjusted for age, sex, race, marital status, comorbidity burden, previous hospital readmissions, and enrollment site. Multivariable linear regression models examining health status adjusted for the same covariates, plus baseline KCCQ score. In exploratory analyses, we tested treatment-by-age and treatment-by-sex interactions for each outcome. Results: The 2,003 patients’ mean age was 67.6 (standard deviation 13.7) years, 52% were female, 47% identified as Black or African American, and 27% as Hispanic. Few demographic differences existed between the arms (Table 1). In adjusted models, examining the interaction effect of sex and treatment on 30-day all-cause readmission, female MIH patients had 50% fewer odds of being readmitted compared to male MIH patients (p=0.01) (Table 2). In adjusted models, examining the interaction effect of age and treatment on 30-day health status, younger MIH patients scored, on average, 5.99 points higher than younger TOCC patients (p=0.03) (Table 3). Conclusions: Compared to patients in the TOCC arm, women and younger patients in the MIH arm who received a CP home visit had reduced readmissions and improved health status, respectively. These findings align with the intention-to-treat analyses (reported separately) and support tailoring MIH services to the patients most likely to benefit.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Cornell University (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.