Abstract 4368490: Intra-Arterial Tenecteplase as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Intra-arterial thrombolytics have emerged as a potential adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, due to suboptimal functional outcomes associated with thrombectomy alone. Several studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial tenecteplase as an adjunctive therapy; however, findings remain variable. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available evidence. Research question: Does adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase improve freedom from disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality when compared to endovascular thrombectomy alone? Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and conference abstracts for studies comparing intra-arterial tenecteplase as an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy versus endovascular thrombectomy alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy outcome was freedom from disability as measured by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and mortality at 90 days. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Results: We included 1226 patients from six studies, of which three were randomised controlled trials. A total of 578 patients (47%) were treated with intra-arterial tenecteplase in addition to endovascular thrombectomy. Treatment with adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase was associated with an increased likelihood of freedom from disability compared to endovascular thrombectomy alone (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.01-1.41; p=0.03; I2 =7%; Figure 1A). There was no significant difference in symptomatic hemorrhage (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.81-2.12; p=0.27; I2=0%; Figure 1B) and mortality at 90 days (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.73-1.15; p=0.46; I2=0%) in the intra-arterial tenecteplase group compared to endovascular thrombectomy alone. These findings were consistent in a subgroup analysis restricted to randomized controlled trials. Conclusion: In patients with acute ischemic stroke, adjunctive intra-arterial tenecteplase was associated with a higher likelihood of freedom from disability compared to endovascular therapy alone, without a corresponding increase in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or 90-day mortality.
Authors
- Audrey Bürki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-2826)
- Shenelle Menezes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-2169)
- Pranav Mellacheruvu
- Douglas Jacoby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4152-6223)
- Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira Amador (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3186-2589)
- Maria Tereza Camarotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4487-1807)
Institutions
- University of Mumbai (IN)
- Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (BR)
- Penn Center for AIDS Research (US)
- University of Pennsylvania Health System (US)
- DGA Partners (US)
- University of Bologna (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4368490
- Primary Topic
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00