Abstract 4362330: Multi-Omics Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Towards Precision Prognostication and Therapy

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, yet current clinical biomarkers offer limited prognostic precision and therapeutic guidance. Emerging multi-omics approaches encompassing transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genomics promise deeper insights into HF pathophysiology and personalized care. Objective: To systematically synthesize and quantitatively analyze the prognostic and therapeutic value of multi-omics biomarkers in HF, bridging molecular discoveries with clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis, querying PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, GEO and ProteomeXchange up to March 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on adult HF populations with reported associations between multi-omics biomarkers and clinical endpoints. Primary outcomes included hazard ratios (HR) for adverse events and biomarker predictive metrics. Results: Twenty-eight studies (including large-scale RCTs and prospective cohorts) encompassing diverse HF phenotypes (HFrEF, HFpEF) were analyzed. The pooled standardized mean difference was 0.273 (95% CI: 0.226–0.320), with a combined HR of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10–1.48), underscoring a robust link between multi-omics signatures and adverse HF outcomes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed key gene expression patterns implicating inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling; proteomic data highlighted biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction and HF subtypes; metabolomic profiles identified metabolic shifts correlated with therapy responsiveness. Moderate heterogeneity (49.8%) and low publication bias affirm the consistency of findings. Conclusion: Our comprehensive multi-omics meta-analysis substantiates the clinical potential of integrative molecular biomarkers to refine HF risk stratification and therapeutic targeting. Future efforts must prioritize methodological standardization, cross-validation, and translational pipelines to unlock precision medicine in heart failure. Impact Statement: This work pioneers a unified multi-omics framework that could revolutionize HF management by enabling precise, personalized prognostication and therapy ushering in the next era of cardiovascular precision medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362330
Primary Topic
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362330: Multi-Omics Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Towards Precision Prognostication and Therapy

Tanya Ratnani, Yuvraj Kaushal, P. Goyal
Circulation
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
article

Abstract 4362330: Multi-Omics Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Towards Precision Prognostication and Therapy

Tanya Ratnani, Yuvraj Kaushal, P. Goyal
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, yet current clinical biomarkers offer limited prognostic precision and therapeutic guidance. Emerging multi-omics approaches encompassing transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genomics promise deeper insights into HF pathophysiology and personalized care. Objective: To systematically synthesize and quantitatively analyze the prognostic and therapeutic value of multi-omics biomarkers in HF, bridging molecular discoveries with clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis, querying PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, GEO and ProteomeXchange up to March 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on adult HF populations with reported associations between multi-omics biomarkers and clinical endpoints. Primary outcomes included hazard ratios (HR) for adverse events and biomarker predictive metrics. Results: Twenty-eight studies (including large-scale RCTs and prospective cohorts) encompassing diverse HF phenotypes (HFrEF, HFpEF) were analyzed. The pooled standardized mean difference was 0.273 (95% CI: 0.226–0.320), with a combined HR of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.10–1.48), underscoring a robust link between multi-omics signatures and adverse HF outcomes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed key gene expression patterns implicating inflammation and extracellular matrix remodeling; proteomic data highlighted biomarkers of mitochondrial dysfunction and HF subtypes; metabolomic profiles identified metabolic shifts correlated with therapy responsiveness. Moderate heterogeneity (49.8%) and low publication bias affirm the consistency of findings. Conclusion: Our comprehensive multi-omics meta-analysis substantiates the clinical potential of integrative molecular biomarkers to refine HF risk stratification and therapeutic targeting. Future efforts must prioritize methodological standardization, cross-validation, and translational pipelines to unlock precision medicine in heart failure. Impact Statement: This work pioneers a unified multi-omics framework that could revolutionize HF management by enabling precise, personalized prognostication and therapy ushering in the next era of cardiovascular precision medicine.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Government Medical College (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.