Abstract 4364923: Does Glycemic Control Matter for Atrial Function? A Propensity-Matched Study Using Echocardiographic Strain Analysis

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial myopathy play a key role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, data on the impact of DM on atrial function remain limited and inconclusive, mostly derived from small studies. Research Question: Is DM and the degree of glycemic control associated with impaired atrial function, as assessed by echocardiographic parameters and endocrine markers? Methods: This retrospective study included patients from a tertiary hospital, stratified into four glycemic groups: (1) non-diabetic; (2) HbA1c 6–7.5%; (3) HbA1c 7.5–9%; and (4) HbA1c >9%. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, body mass index, and chronic kidney disease. Atrial function was assessed by echocardiography, including indexed left atrial volume (LAVI) and left atrial strain in the reservoir (LAS-r), conduit (LAS-cd), and contraction (LAS-ct) phases. NT-proBNP levels were also measured. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality, incident atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolic events. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with 95% confidence intervals reported. Results: After PSM, 248 patients were included: 124 (50%) non-diabetic, 68 (27.4%) with DM and HbA1c 6–7.5%, 32 (12.9%) with HbA1c 7.5–9%, and 24 (9.7%) with HbA1c >9%. Mean age across groups was 64.2, 61.8, 61.1, and 62.6 years, respectively; 155 (62.5%) were women, and mean BMI was 34.1 kg/m2. Hypertension prevalence ranged from 90.3% to 91.7% (Figure 1). No significant differences were found in the use of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, statins, or beta-blockers. SGLT2 inhibitor use was more frequent among patients with DM and HbA1c <9%. There were no significant differences in LAVI (p=0.56), LAS-r (p=0.98), LAS-cd (p=0.32), or LAS-ct (p=0.60). NT-proBNP levels were also similar across groups (p=0.978) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). At 2-year follow-up, there were no documented cases of atrial fibrillation, and no significant differences in mortality or thromboembolic events among groups. Conclusion: In this PSM cohort comparing patients with DM across varying glycemic control levels to non-diabetic individuals, no significant differences were observed in left atrial volume or function by echocardiography. Likewise, no differences were found in all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation, or thromboembolic events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364923
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364923: Does Glycemic Control Matter for Atrial Function? A Propensity-Matched Study Using Echocardiographic Strain Analysis

Rafaela Andrade Penalva Freitas, Kleber G. Franchini, Mariane Higa Shinzato, Eduardo da Silva Farias et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4364923: Does Glycemic Control Matter for Atrial Function? A Propensity-Matched Study Using Echocardiographic Strain Analysis

Rafaela Andrade Penalva Freitas, Kleber G. Franchini, Mariane Higa Shinzato, Eduardo da Silva Farias, C Guida, Tacianne Delamain
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and atrial myopathy play a key role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. However, data on the impact of DM on atrial function remain limited and inconclusive, mostly derived from small studies. Research Question: Is DM and the degree of glycemic control associated with impaired atrial function, as assessed by echocardiographic parameters and endocrine markers? Methods: This retrospective study included patients from a tertiary hospital, stratified into four glycemic groups: (1) non-diabetic; (2) HbA1c 6–7.5%; (3) HbA1c 7.5–9%; and (4) HbA1c >9%. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, body mass index, and chronic kidney disease. Atrial function was assessed by echocardiography, including indexed left atrial volume (LAVI) and left atrial strain in the reservoir (LAS-r), conduit (LAS-cd), and contraction (LAS-ct) phases. NT-proBNP levels were also measured. Long-term outcomes included all-cause mortality, incident atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolic events. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with 95% confidence intervals reported. Results: After PSM, 248 patients were included: 124 (50%) non-diabetic, 68 (27.4%) with DM and HbA1c 6–7.5%, 32 (12.9%) with HbA1c 7.5–9%, and 24 (9.7%) with HbA1c >9%. Mean age across groups was 64.2, 61.8, 61.1, and 62.6 years, respectively; 155 (62.5%) were women, and mean BMI was 34.1 kg/m2. Hypertension prevalence ranged from 90.3% to 91.7% (Figure 1). No significant differences were found in the use of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, statins, or beta-blockers. SGLT2 inhibitor use was more frequent among patients with DM and HbA1c <9%. There were no significant differences in LAVI (p=0.56), LAS-r (p=0.98), LAS-cd (p=0.32), or LAS-ct (p=0.60). NT-proBNP levels were also similar across groups (p=0.978) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). At 2-year follow-up, there were no documented cases of atrial fibrillation, and no significant differences in mortality or thromboembolic events among groups. Conclusion: In this PSM cohort comparing patients with DM across varying glycemic control levels to non-diabetic individuals, no significant differences were observed in left atrial volume or function by echocardiography. Likewise, no differences were found in all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation, or thromboembolic events.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.