Abstract 4371270: Prognostic Utility of Exercise Pulmonary Artery Pulse Pressure in Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Exercise testing has been proven to improve phenotypic resolution and risk stratification in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that exercise pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PA PP) has the potential to differentiate HFpEF disease states and predict outcomes. Methods: In a single-center cohort of patients referred for invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing, we identified patients with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF (resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mmHg or PCWP/cardiac output (CO) slope > 2 mmHg/L/min, and left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%). Patients with respiratory exchange ratio < 1 indicating submaximal exercise and < 2 years of follow-up were excluded. We measured PA PP at 3 time points: rest, end of unloaded exercise, and peak exercise. Patients were categorized as having a low versus high PA PP at each time point based on the median value of our cohort, as no cutoff values for PA PP have been defined in the literature thus far. We identified four distinct phenotypes based on PA PP at each time point: Low-Low-Low (Trajectory 1, n=71); Low-Low-High (Trajectory 2, n=29); Low-High-High (Trajectory 3, n=43); and High-High-High (Trajectory 4, n=85) ( Figure Panel A ). Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, peak oxygen consumption, and ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across PA PP trajectories. Rest and exercise hemodynamics are shown in Panel B . We found that higher PA PP trajectory was associated with worse survival (log rank p=0.0025, Panel C ). Specifically, survival in patients who had a rise in PA PP at the end of unloaded exercise (Trajectory 3) was similar to patients with high PA PP throughout (Trajectory 4). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, PA PP trajectory remained a significant predictor of survival (HR 1.58, 95% CI [1.12-2.25], p=0.009). Conclusion: We identified four clinically distinct phenotypes of HFpEF based on PA PP trajectory during exercise. In our single-center cohort, exercise PA PP trajectory predicted all-cause mortality in hemodynamically defined HFpEF and may be an early indicator of abnormal pulmonary vasculature. Future studies are needed to correlate PA PP with known measures of ventricular-vascular coupling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371270
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371270: Prognostic Utility of Exercise Pulmonary Artery Pulse Pressure in Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Gregory D. Lewis, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra, Ashvita Ramesh, Bin Yang et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4371270: Prognostic Utility of Exercise Pulmonary Artery Pulse Pressure in Ambulatory Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Gregory D. Lewis, Rajeev Kumar Malhotra, Ashvita Ramesh, Bin Yang, Isabela Landsteiner
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Exercise testing has been proven to improve phenotypic resolution and risk stratification in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We hypothesized that exercise pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PA PP) has the potential to differentiate HFpEF disease states and predict outcomes. Methods: In a single-center cohort of patients referred for invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing, we identified patients with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF (resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mmHg or PCWP/cardiac output (CO) slope > 2 mmHg/L/min, and left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%). Patients with respiratory exchange ratio < 1 indicating submaximal exercise and < 2 years of follow-up were excluded. We measured PA PP at 3 time points: rest, end of unloaded exercise, and peak exercise. Patients were categorized as having a low versus high PA PP at each time point based on the median value of our cohort, as no cutoff values for PA PP have been defined in the literature thus far. We identified four distinct phenotypes based on PA PP at each time point: Low-Low-Low (Trajectory 1, n=71); Low-Low-High (Trajectory 2, n=29); Low-High-High (Trajectory 3, n=43); and High-High-High (Trajectory 4, n=85) ( Figure Panel A ). Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, peak oxygen consumption, and ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar across PA PP trajectories. Rest and exercise hemodynamics are shown in Panel B . We found that higher PA PP trajectory was associated with worse survival (log rank p=0.0025, Panel C ). Specifically, survival in patients who had a rise in PA PP at the end of unloaded exercise (Trajectory 3) was similar to patients with high PA PP throughout (Trajectory 4). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, PA PP trajectory remained a significant predictor of survival (HR 1.58, 95% CI [1.12-2.25], p=0.009). Conclusion: We identified four clinically distinct phenotypes of HFpEF based on PA PP trajectory during exercise. In our single-center cohort, exercise PA PP trajectory predicted all-cause mortality in hemodynamically defined HFpEF and may be an early indicator of abnormal pulmonary vasculature. Future studies are needed to correlate PA PP with known measures of ventricular-vascular coupling.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.