Abstract 4364919: Association of Antiphospholipid Syndrome with Infective Endocarditis and Staphylococcal Sepsis: A U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) predisposes patients to thrombosis and cardiac valve lesions (e.g., Libman-Sacks endocarditis). These vegetations, though sterile, may serve as a nidus for infection. The risk of infective endocarditis (IE) and other serious infections in APS patients within large populations remains poorly quantified, representing a key knowledge gap. Research Questions/Hypothesis: To quantify the risk of the primary outcome, IE, and secondary outcomes of MRSA sepsis and MSSA sepsis, associated with APS using a large, nationally representative inpatient database. Methods/Approach: This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. Hospitalized patients aged 18-75 with APS were compared to those without APS. Patients with major pre-existing risks for IE or significant confounders (e.g., prosthetic valves, specific congenital/rheumatic heart diseases, ESRD) were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hospital region, primary payer, median household income, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) status. Results/Data: A total of 297,459 patients met inclusion criteria; 223 hospitalizations (0.075%) had an APS diagnosis. APS patients were significantly younger (mean age 46.9 ± 14.4 vs. 50.8 ± 14.6 years, p<0.001) and more often female (72.6% vs. 40.0%, p<0.001). Unadjusted analyses revealed higher IE prevalence in APS (8.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.002), MRSA sepsis (14.3% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.004), and MSSA sepsis (15.2% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, APS was significantly associated with over double the odds of IE (aOR 2.03; 95% CI 1.22–3.37; p = 0.007). APS also conferred increased risks of MRSA sepsis (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.18–2.58; p=0.005) and MSSA sepsis (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.28–2.70; p=0.001). In-hospital mortality within the IE cohort was not significantly different (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.543). Conclusion(s): APS emerged as a significant independent risk factor for IE, MRSA, and MSSA sepsis in this nationwide analysis. These findings suggest a broader vulnerability to infection in APS, highlighting the critical need for increased clinical suspicion, vigilant monitoring, and potentially tailored prophylactic or treatment approaches for severe infections in these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4364919
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4364919: Association of Antiphospholipid Syndrome with Infective Endocarditis and Staphylococcal Sepsis: A U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Chapman Wei, Jessica Schwartz, Chloé Lahoud, Martin Miguel Inocencio Amor et al.
Circulation
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Abstract 4364919: Association of Antiphospholipid Syndrome with Infective Endocarditis and Staphylococcal Sepsis: A U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Chapman Wei, Jessica Schwartz, Chloé Lahoud, Martin Miguel Inocencio Amor, Ahmad Mustafa, Mitchell Weinberg, Bahy Abofrekha
article en

Abstract

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) predisposes patients to thrombosis and cardiac valve lesions (e.g., Libman-Sacks endocarditis). These vegetations, though sterile, may serve as a nidus for infection. The risk of infective endocarditis (IE) and other serious infections in APS patients within large populations remains poorly quantified, representing a key knowledge gap. Research Questions/Hypothesis: To quantify the risk of the primary outcome, IE, and secondary outcomes of MRSA sepsis and MSSA sepsis, associated with APS using a large, nationally representative inpatient database. Methods/Approach: This retrospective cross-sectional study utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. Hospitalized patients aged 18-75 with APS were compared to those without APS. Patients with major pre-existing risks for IE or significant confounders (e.g., prosthetic valves, specific congenital/rheumatic heart diseases, ESRD) were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hospital region, primary payer, median household income, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) status. Results/Data: A total of 297,459 patients met inclusion criteria; 223 hospitalizations (0.075%) had an APS diagnosis. APS patients were significantly younger (mean age 46.9 ± 14.4 vs. 50.8 ± 14.6 years, p<0.001) and more often female (72.6% vs. 40.0%, p<0.001). Unadjusted analyses revealed higher IE prevalence in APS (8.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.002), MRSA sepsis (14.3% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.004), and MSSA sepsis (15.2% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, APS was significantly associated with over double the odds of IE (aOR 2.03; 95% CI 1.22–3.37; p = 0.007). APS also conferred increased risks of MRSA sepsis (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.18–2.58; p=0.005) and MSSA sepsis (aOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.28–2.70; p=0.001). In-hospital mortality within the IE cohort was not significantly different (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.543). Conclusion(s): APS emerged as a significant independent risk factor for IE, MRSA, and MSSA sepsis in this nationwide analysis. These findings suggest a broader vulnerability to infection in APS, highlighting the critical need for increased clinical suspicion, vigilant monitoring, and potentially tailored prophylactic or treatment approaches for severe infections in these patients.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwell Health (US), Staten Island University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.