Abstract 4362307: Automated Aortic Valve Motion Analysis from Echocardiography for Efficient Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment traditionally relies on Doppler echocardiography, which is time-consuming and may be inconclusive in a subset of patients. Efficient, automated approaches using routinely acquired 2D echocardiographic views could support clinical workflows by rapidly classifying AS severity with minimal user input. Research Question: Can a computer vision algorithm applied to a single echocardiographic view efficiently classify AS severity based on aortic valve leaflet motion? Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 223 echocardiograms from patients undergoing routine clinical evaluation for suspected AS across the entire severity spectrum. All studies included parasternal long-axis (PLAX) views for visualising aortic valve motion. A semi-automated computer vision algorithm was developed to track the angular motion of the right coronary cusp (RCC) of the aortic valve. From this, we derived a novel quantitative feature, leaflet angular displacement. To normalise for hemodynamic variability, leaflet displacement was indexed by transaortic volumetric flow rate derived from Doppler measurements, resulting in a derived metric termed displacement:flow ratio. AS severity was classified into three categories – no AS, moderate AS, and severe AS – based on current clinical guidelines. We evaluated model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Of the 223 patients included, 65 had no AS, 69 had moderate AS, and 89 had severe AS. The algorithm achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.13%, with an AUC of 0.96 (Figure 1), demonstrating excellent discriminative capability. The sensitivity for detecting AS was 95.24%, while the specificity was 84.38%. Performance was highest in studies with optimal leaflet visualisation, where the algorithm exhibited robust tracking and consistent measurements. Conclusions: Leaflet motion analysis from the PLAX view using computer vision enables efficient classification of AS severity without the need for Doppler data. This approach holds promise as a rapid screening tool to augment existing clinical workflows, particularly where Doppler measurements are challenging or unavailable. Future work will focus on improving robustness to suboptimal imaging, extending the approach to incorporate additional echocardiographic views, and validating model performance to support generalizability and translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4362307
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4362307: Automated Aortic Valve Motion Analysis from Echocardiography for Efficient Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Farhan Mohammed, Mayooran Namasivayam, Jason Kovacic, Erik Meijering et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4362307: Automated Aortic Valve Motion Analysis from Echocardiography for Efficient Classification of Aortic Stenosis Severity

Farhan Mohammed, Mayooran Namasivayam, Jason Kovacic, Erik Meijering, Michael P. Feneley, Sebastiano Barbieri, T. Meredith, David C. Muller, Chris Hayward, Amy Pomeroy
article en

Abstract

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) severity assessment traditionally relies on Doppler echocardiography, which is time-consuming and may be inconclusive in a subset of patients. Efficient, automated approaches using routinely acquired 2D echocardiographic views could support clinical workflows by rapidly classifying AS severity with minimal user input. Research Question: Can a computer vision algorithm applied to a single echocardiographic view efficiently classify AS severity based on aortic valve leaflet motion? Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 223 echocardiograms from patients undergoing routine clinical evaluation for suspected AS across the entire severity spectrum. All studies included parasternal long-axis (PLAX) views for visualising aortic valve motion. A semi-automated computer vision algorithm was developed to track the angular motion of the right coronary cusp (RCC) of the aortic valve. From this, we derived a novel quantitative feature, leaflet angular displacement. To normalise for hemodynamic variability, leaflet displacement was indexed by transaortic volumetric flow rate derived from Doppler measurements, resulting in a derived metric termed displacement:flow ratio. AS severity was classified into three categories – no AS, moderate AS, and severe AS – based on current clinical guidelines. We evaluated model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Of the 223 patients included, 65 had no AS, 69 had moderate AS, and 89 had severe AS. The algorithm achieved an overall classification accuracy of 87.13%, with an AUC of 0.96 (Figure 1), demonstrating excellent discriminative capability. The sensitivity for detecting AS was 95.24%, while the specificity was 84.38%. Performance was highest in studies with optimal leaflet visualisation, where the algorithm exhibited robust tracking and consistent measurements. Conclusions: Leaflet motion analysis from the PLAX view using computer vision enables efficient classification of AS severity without the need for Doppler data. This approach holds promise as a rapid screening tool to augment existing clinical workflows, particularly where Doppler measurements are challenging or unavailable. Future work will focus on improving robustness to suboptimal imaging, extending the approach to incorporate additional echocardiographic views, and validating model performance to support generalizability and translation.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), St Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.