Abstract 4366322: Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among cancer patients and poses unique management challenges, especially regarding stroke prevention and bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological strategy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF who are at high risk of bleeding. Yet its safety and efficacy in cancer patients remain inadequately characterized. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate both periprocedural and long-term outcomes of LAAO in patients with AF and cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Studies comparing LAAO outcomes in cancer patients with those in non-cancer patients were included in the analysis. Random-effects models were used to calculate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Review Manager 5.0 (RevMan) was utilized for all statistical analyses. The outcomes evaluated were periprocedural complications as well as long-term endpoints, including stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality, over a mean follow-up duration of 1.6 years. Results: Six studies, including 11,693 cases of cancer with atrial fibrillation (AF), were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in periprocedural complications between cancer and non-cancer patients undergoing the LAAO procedure (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.88–1.63; p = 0.25). Over a mean follow-up of 1.6 years, cancer patients had a significantly lower risk of stroke compared with non-cancer patients (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.95; p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of long-term bleeding events (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.93–1.67; p = 0.15). However, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among cancer patients (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.23–2.48; p < 0.01). Conclusion: LAAO appears to be a safe and effective strategy for stroke prevention in cancer patients with AF, with a comparable periprocedural risk profile and lower stroke rates. However, increased all-cause mortality highlights the need for individualized decision-making and further studies to define optimal patient selection. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, cancer, left atrial appendage occlusion, stroke, mortality

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4366322
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4366322: Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Akshat Banga, Ashish Yadav, Huda H. Al‐Khalaf, Keshav Bhattar et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4366322: Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Akshat Banga, Ashish Yadav, Huda H. Al‐Khalaf, Keshav Bhattar, Sawai Singh Rathore, Mahendra Kumar, Ibrahim Al Shyyab
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among cancer patients and poses unique management challenges, especially regarding stroke prevention and bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological strategy for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF who are at high risk of bleeding. Yet its safety and efficacy in cancer patients remain inadequately characterized. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate both periprocedural and long-term outcomes of LAAO in patients with AF and cancer. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Studies comparing LAAO outcomes in cancer patients with those in non-cancer patients were included in the analysis. Random-effects models were used to calculate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Review Manager 5.0 (RevMan) was utilized for all statistical analyses. The outcomes evaluated were periprocedural complications as well as long-term endpoints, including stroke, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality, over a mean follow-up duration of 1.6 years. Results: Six studies, including 11,693 cases of cancer with atrial fibrillation (AF), were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in periprocedural complications between cancer and non-cancer patients undergoing the LAAO procedure (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.88–1.63; p = 0.25). Over a mean follow-up of 1.6 years, cancer patients had a significantly lower risk of stroke compared with non-cancer patients (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61–0.95; p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of long-term bleeding events (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.93–1.67; p = 0.15). However, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among cancer patients (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.23–2.48; p < 0.01). Conclusion: LAAO appears to be a safe and effective strategy for stroke prevention in cancer patients with AF, with a comparable periprocedural risk profile and lower stroke rates. However, increased all-cause mortality highlights the need for individualized decision-making and further studies to define optimal patient selection. Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, cancer, left atrial appendage occlusion, stroke, mortality

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Mount Auburn Hospital (US), Southern Illinois University School of Medicine (US), Sardar Patel Medical College (IN), University of Sharjah (AE), Memorial Healthcare System (US), St. Vincent Hospital (US), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.