Abstract 4367655: Comparative Cardiometabolic Outcomes of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide in Patients with HFpEF and Obesity: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study

Background: HFpEF frequently coexists with obesity and type 2 diabetes, both of which are associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) like semaglutide have shown promise in weight and glycemic control, while tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, may offer superior metabolic effects. However, comparative real-world cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients remain understudied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults with a diagnosis of HFpEF and obesity who were treated with either semaglutide or tirzepatide were identified.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cholelithiasis, and pancreatitis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and baseline medications Results: After matching, 40,047 patients were included (Semaglutide: 20,028; Tirzepatide: 20,019). All-cause mortality was higher with Semaglutide (2.9% vs 2.0%; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.29–1.67, p<0.001). Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.8% of Semaglutide users vs 2.2% with Tirzepatide (OR 1.28, p=0.001), while heart failure exacerbations were more frequent with Semaglutide (10.1% vs 8.3%; OR 1.24, p=0.012). Acute kidney injury was also slightly higher in the Semaglutide group (7.0% vs 6.2%; OR 1.14, p=0.016), as were readmissions (13.1% vs 10.2%; OR 1.33, p<0.001). Rates of cholelithiasis (1.7% vs 1.5%) and pancreatitis (0.4% vs 0.4%) were comparable. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly better survival with Tirzepatide (85.8% vs 74.7%, p<0.001), with a corresponding hazard ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.12–1.45), favoring Tirzepatide. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort of obese patients with HFpEF, Tirzepatide was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, HF exacerbation, and readmissions compared to Semaglutide, without a significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the potential cardioprotective role of Tirzepatide and warrant prospective validation in HFpEF populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4367655
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4367655: Comparative Cardiometabolic Outcomes of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide in Patients with HFpEF and Obesity: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study

Hritvik Jain, Pragyat Futela, Ritu C. Tated, Siddharth Agrawal et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4367655: Comparative Cardiometabolic Outcomes of Tirzepatide Versus Semaglutide in Patients with HFpEF and Obesity: A Real-World Multicenter Cohort Study

Hritvik Jain, Pragyat Futela, Ritu C. Tated, Siddharth Agrawal, Kriti Soni, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
article en

Abstract

Background: HFpEF frequently coexists with obesity and type 2 diabetes, both of which are associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) like semaglutide have shown promise in weight and glycemic control, while tirzepatide, a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, may offer superior metabolic effects. However, comparative real-world cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients remain understudied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network. Adults with a diagnosis of HFpEF and obesity who were treated with either semaglutide or tirzepatide were identified.The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cholelithiasis, and pancreatitis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and baseline medications Results: After matching, 40,047 patients were included (Semaglutide: 20,028; Tirzepatide: 20,019). All-cause mortality was higher with Semaglutide (2.9% vs 2.0%; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.29–1.67, p<0.001). Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.8% of Semaglutide users vs 2.2% with Tirzepatide (OR 1.28, p=0.001), while heart failure exacerbations were more frequent with Semaglutide (10.1% vs 8.3%; OR 1.24, p=0.012). Acute kidney injury was also slightly higher in the Semaglutide group (7.0% vs 6.2%; OR 1.14, p=0.016), as were readmissions (13.1% vs 10.2%; OR 1.33, p<0.001). Rates of cholelithiasis (1.7% vs 1.5%) and pancreatitis (0.4% vs 0.4%) were comparable. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly better survival with Tirzepatide (85.8% vs 74.7%, p<0.001), with a corresponding hazard ratio of 1.28 (95% CI 1.12–1.45), favoring Tirzepatide. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort of obese patients with HFpEF, Tirzepatide was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, HF exacerbation, and readmissions compared to Semaglutide, without a significant increase in adverse events. These findings support the potential cardioprotective role of Tirzepatide and warrant prospective validation in HFpEF populations.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
MetroHealth (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Brown University (US), Buffalo Medical Group (US), CVS Health (United States) (US), MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.