Abstract 4348064: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

There is a class I recommendation for lead extraction in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) the calculus is more complicated due to multiple prior vascular accesses, long lead dwell times, LVAD hardware infections, and the inherent risks of performing invasive procedures in a hemodynamically fragile population. Comprehensive outcome data to guide management in this subset of patients is limited. We aimed to evaluate the procedural efficacy, complication rates, and mortality following CIED lead extraction in patients with LVADs who developed device-related infections. A systematic literature review of five electronic databases was conducted. We included all published studies of LVAD patients undergoing lead extraction for CIED-related infection and our unpublished, retrospectively gathered institutional cohort. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of complete procedural success. Secondary outcomes included minor and major procedural complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Outcomes of interest were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird). Heterogeneity was quantified using I^2 and τ^2 statistics. Seven published observational studies and our unpublished institutional data comprised 88 patients (22.7% female, mean age 58.7 years). The pooled rate of complete procedural success was 91% [95% CI: 86%–94%]. Minor complications occurred in 12% [95% CI: 9%–17%]. The 30-day mortality was 18% [95% CI: 3%–60%] and the 1-year mortality was 30% [95% CI: 17%–49%]. Heterogeneity was low to moderate across outcomes (I^2: 0–31.5%). No procedural mortality or major complications were reported. CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients with device-related infection is associated with high procedural success and low complication rates. The lack of major complications associated with lead extractions suggests that the high post-extraction mortality is a consequence of the high-risk population rather than the procedure itself. Our results suggest that when clinically indicated, CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients is a feasible and effective intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4348064
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4348064: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Derrick Draeger, Emily Xiao, Mihail G. Chelu, Patrick Lynch et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4348064: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes Following Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infections in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Derrick Draeger, Emily Xiao, Mihail G. Chelu, Patrick Lynch, Alexandra Lewis, Faiz Baqai
article en

Abstract

There is a class I recommendation for lead extraction in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. However, in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) the calculus is more complicated due to multiple prior vascular accesses, long lead dwell times, LVAD hardware infections, and the inherent risks of performing invasive procedures in a hemodynamically fragile population. Comprehensive outcome data to guide management in this subset of patients is limited. We aimed to evaluate the procedural efficacy, complication rates, and mortality following CIED lead extraction in patients with LVADs who developed device-related infections. A systematic literature review of five electronic databases was conducted. We included all published studies of LVAD patients undergoing lead extraction for CIED-related infection and our unpublished, retrospectively gathered institutional cohort. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of complete procedural success. Secondary outcomes included minor and major procedural complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Outcomes of interest were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird). Heterogeneity was quantified using I^2 and τ^2 statistics. Seven published observational studies and our unpublished institutional data comprised 88 patients (22.7% female, mean age 58.7 years). The pooled rate of complete procedural success was 91% [95% CI: 86%–94%]. Minor complications occurred in 12% [95% CI: 9%–17%]. The 30-day mortality was 18% [95% CI: 3%–60%] and the 1-year mortality was 30% [95% CI: 17%–49%]. Heterogeneity was low to moderate across outcomes (I^2: 0–31.5%). No procedural mortality or major complications were reported. CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients with device-related infection is associated with high procedural success and low complication rates. The lack of major complications associated with lead extractions suggests that the high post-extraction mortality is a consequence of the high-risk population rather than the procedure itself. Our results suggest that when clinically indicated, CIED lead extraction in LVAD recipients is a feasible and effective intervention.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.