Abstract 4371211: Impact of Aspirin Use on Amputation Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risk in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients: Insights from a High-Risk Cohort

Background: Aspirin therapy is well-established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events; however, its role in modifying amputation outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. Research Question: Does aspirin therapy influence the likelihood of major versus minor amputations in PAD? Aims: To evaluate the association between aspirin use and the level of lower extremity amputation (major vs. minor) in patients with PAD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 387 PAD patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, classified as major (n=122) or minor (n=262) procedures. The cohort had a mean age of 64.1 ± 12.8 years and was predominantly male (72.1%). Cardiometabolic comorbidities were highly prevalent, with diabetes in 95.1%, hypertension in 88.4%, and hyperlipidemia in 81.1%. Among these patients, 239 (61.8%) were receiving aspirin therapy. We assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, amputation level, reintervention needs, wound healing, and post-operative outcomes. Results: Aspirin users exhibited a substantial burden of comorbid conditions, with diabetes present in 96.2%, hypertension in 92.9%, and hyperlipidemia in 88.3%. Major amputations occurred in 16.3% of aspirin users, while 15.5% underwent minor amputations. Logistic regression demonstrated no significant association between aspirin use and lower odds of major amputation compared to minor amputation (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.62–1.85; p=0.806). Secondary amputations occurred in 32.6% of the total cohort, with 30.7% requiring reinterventions. Cardiovascular events post-amputation were notable, with 19.1% experiencing myocardial infarction and 1.0% suffering a stroke. Wound healing was achieved in 78.8%, though recurrent ulceration occurred in 19.4%. Mortality during follow-up was 15.2%. Among aspirin users with available data, disease control was suboptimal: only 56.5% had well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.5%), 38.1% had LDL cholesterol <2.0 mmol/L, and 59.8% had blood pressure <140/90 mmHg. Notably, none met the prealbumin threshold for adequate nutritional status. Conclusion: In this high-risk PAD population, aspirin use did not confer a statistically significant reduction in the odds of major versus minor amputation. The high prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, suboptimal risk factor control, and significant rates of secondary procedures highlights the need for enhanced vascular care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4371211
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4371211: Impact of Aspirin Use on Amputation Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risk in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients: Insights from a High-Risk Cohort

Batool Abuhalimeh, Jason Chin, Mohammad Qadura, Abdelrahman Zamzam et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4371211: Impact of Aspirin Use on Amputation Outcomes and Cardiovascular Risk in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients: Insights from a High-Risk Cohort

Batool Abuhalimeh, Jason Chin, Mohammad Qadura, Abdelrahman Zamzam, Lina Abuhalimeh, Houssam Younes, Erika Linder, Musa'ab Moh'd Alhmouz
article en

Abstract

Background: Aspirin therapy is well-established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events; however, its role in modifying amputation outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. Research Question: Does aspirin therapy influence the likelihood of major versus minor amputations in PAD? Aims: To evaluate the association between aspirin use and the level of lower extremity amputation (major vs. minor) in patients with PAD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 387 PAD patients undergoing lower extremity amputation, classified as major (n=122) or minor (n=262) procedures. The cohort had a mean age of 64.1 ± 12.8 years and was predominantly male (72.1%). Cardiometabolic comorbidities were highly prevalent, with diabetes in 95.1%, hypertension in 88.4%, and hyperlipidemia in 81.1%. Among these patients, 239 (61.8%) were receiving aspirin therapy. We assessed the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, amputation level, reintervention needs, wound healing, and post-operative outcomes. Results: Aspirin users exhibited a substantial burden of comorbid conditions, with diabetes present in 96.2%, hypertension in 92.9%, and hyperlipidemia in 88.3%. Major amputations occurred in 16.3% of aspirin users, while 15.5% underwent minor amputations. Logistic regression demonstrated no significant association between aspirin use and lower odds of major amputation compared to minor amputation (OR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.62–1.85; p=0.806). Secondary amputations occurred in 32.6% of the total cohort, with 30.7% requiring reinterventions. Cardiovascular events post-amputation were notable, with 19.1% experiencing myocardial infarction and 1.0% suffering a stroke. Wound healing was achieved in 78.8%, though recurrent ulceration occurred in 19.4%. Mortality during follow-up was 15.2%. Among aspirin users with available data, disease control was suboptimal: only 56.5% had well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c ≤ 7.5%), 38.1% had LDL cholesterol <2.0 mmol/L, and 59.8% had blood pressure <140/90 mmHg. Notably, none met the prealbumin threshold for adequate nutritional status. Conclusion: In this high-risk PAD population, aspirin use did not confer a statistically significant reduction in the odds of major versus minor amputation. The high prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors, suboptimal risk factor control, and significant rates of secondary procedures highlights the need for enhanced vascular care.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Abu Dhabi Health Services (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.