Abstract 4370478: Effectiveness of Mobile Medical Clinics in Blood Pressure Control in Low Resource Settings

Background: In low-resource settings, limited healthcare access contributes to uncontrolled hypertension and elevated cardiovascular risk. Mobile medical clinics (MMCs) offer a potential solution, yet evidence of their long-term effectiveness remains limited. Hypothesis: This study evaluated whether MMCs improve blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive adults and whether greater follow-up adherence enhances outcomes. We hypothesized that more frequent visits would be associated with greater BP reductions and higher rates of achieving guideline-recommended targets. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of adults aged ≥19 years who accessed MMC services across 15 underserved communities from 2017 to 2019 in Pampanga, Philippines. Adults with hypertension and ≥1 comorbid non-communicable disease were included if they had ≥2 visits with documented blood pressure measurements. Good follow-up, reflecting continuity of care, was defined as attending at least 50% of expected visits. Outcomes included changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Program reach was assessed using entry, participation, and retention rates. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-squared tests, and adjusted linear and logistic regressions. Results: Of 6,562 MMC users, 1,839 (28%) had hypertension with a chronic comorbidity and 266 met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.5 ± 9.9 years, 75% female, 51% with diabetes). Program entry increased from 2.9% to 27.1% over three years, with higher uptake in rural than urban communities (30.1% vs 18.7%, p<0.001). Among patients with good follow-up (n=114, mean adherence 71%), systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by visit five (−7.8 ± 0.9 mmHg and −5.0 ± 0.8 mmHg, p<0.001), and target blood pressure achievement rose from 15.8% to 56.1% (p<0.001). Good follow-up was associated with an additional 4.2 mmHg systolic reduction (95% CI: −6.7 to −1.7) and 2.8 times higher odds of blood pressure control (95% CI: 1.7–4.6). No significant changes were observed among patients with poor follow-up. Conclusion: MMCs effectively improve hypertension control in low-resource settings, particularly with consistent follow-up. Findings support broader adoption of MMCs with enhanced retention strategies to maximize impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4370478
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4370478: Effectiveness of Mobile Medical Clinics in Blood Pressure Control in Low Resource Settings

K. Mesia, Anthony Zhong, Deanna D. Nguyen, Doyeon Hwang et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4370478: Effectiveness of Mobile Medical Clinics in Blood Pressure Control in Low Resource Settings

K. Mesia, Anthony Zhong, Deanna D. Nguyen, Doyeon Hwang, Kaylin Mahal Smith, John Kent Lin, Tam Tran, Julieta Gabiola, Ramez M. Odat, Arthur Gallo, Marian Roman
article en

Abstract

Background: In low-resource settings, limited healthcare access contributes to uncontrolled hypertension and elevated cardiovascular risk. Mobile medical clinics (MMCs) offer a potential solution, yet evidence of their long-term effectiveness remains limited. Hypothesis: This study evaluated whether MMCs improve blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive adults and whether greater follow-up adherence enhances outcomes. We hypothesized that more frequent visits would be associated with greater BP reductions and higher rates of achieving guideline-recommended targets. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of adults aged ≥19 years who accessed MMC services across 15 underserved communities from 2017 to 2019 in Pampanga, Philippines. Adults with hypertension and ≥1 comorbid non-communicable disease were included if they had ≥2 visits with documented blood pressure measurements. Good follow-up, reflecting continuity of care, was defined as attending at least 50% of expected visits. Outcomes included changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Program reach was assessed using entry, participation, and retention rates. Statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-squared tests, and adjusted linear and logistic regressions. Results: Of 6,562 MMC users, 1,839 (28%) had hypertension with a chronic comorbidity and 266 met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.5 ± 9.9 years, 75% female, 51% with diabetes). Program entry increased from 2.9% to 27.1% over three years, with higher uptake in rural than urban communities (30.1% vs 18.7%, p<0.001). Among patients with good follow-up (n=114, mean adherence 71%), systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly by visit five (−7.8 ± 0.9 mmHg and −5.0 ± 0.8 mmHg, p<0.001), and target blood pressure achievement rose from 15.8% to 56.1% (p<0.001). Good follow-up was associated with an additional 4.2 mmHg systolic reduction (95% CI: −6.7 to −1.7) and 2.8 times higher odds of blood pressure control (95% CI: 1.7–4.6). No significant changes were observed among patients with poor follow-up. Conclusion: MMCs effectively improve hypertension control in low-resource settings, particularly with consistent follow-up. Findings support broader adoption of MMCs with enhanced retention strategies to maximize impact.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
University of the Philippines System (PH), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of Manila (PH), Yale University (US), University of the Philippines Manila (PH), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.