Abstract 4369478: Comparative Outcomes of Multi-Arterial versus Single Arterial Grafting in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Patients with ischemic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remain at high risk despite surgical revascularization. While single arterial grafting (SAG) is standard in CABG, multi-arterial grafting (MAG) may offer better outcomes. However, its benefits in patients with reduced ejection fraction remain unclear. Aims: To evaluate whether MAG offers superior survival and clinical outcomes compared to SAG in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted for studies comparing MAG and SAG in patients with LVEF <50%. Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival, cardiac death, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were MACE, perioperative MI, atrial fibrillation, reoperation, repeat revascularization, IABP use, stroke, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 19,976 patients were included (MAG: 10,306; SAG: 9,670). MAG was associated with significantly higher 5-year survival (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.32–1.70; p < 0.00001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55–0.79; p < 0.00001), with a trend toward reduced cardiac death (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.50–1.12; p = 0.16). No significant differences were seen in MACE (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; p = 0.08), MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–1.06; p = 0.09), or repeat revascularization (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.23–1.68; p = 0.35). Reoperation was marginally lower with MAG (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31–1.00; p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in stroke (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92–1.65; p = 0.16), atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.55–1.56; p = 0.78), IABP use (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.49–1.15; p = 0.18), hospital stay (MD: 0.03; 95% CI: –0.64 to 0.70; p = 0.93), ICU stay (MD: 0.17; 95% CI: –0.30 to 0.63; p = 0.48), dialysis (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.61–1.38; p = 0.68), or sternal wound infection (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.83–2.94; p = 0.17). Conclusions: In patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG, MAG is associated with improved 5-year survival and lower in-hospital mortality without increased perioperative complications. These findings support broader consideration of MAG in this high-risk group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4369478
Primary Topic
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4369478: Comparative Outcomes of Multi-Arterial versus Single Arterial Grafting in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Uazman Alam, Ali Khan, Javeria Javed, Muhammad Abdullah Ali et al.
Circulation
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
article

Abstract 4369478: Comparative Outcomes of Multi-Arterial versus Single Arterial Grafting in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Uazman Alam, Ali Khan, Javeria Javed, Muhammad Abdullah Ali, Muhammad Osama, Abdullah Afridi, Iqra Shahid, Fathimathul Henna, Mian Zahid Jan Kakakhel, Zaryab Bacha, Maheen Sheraz
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with ischemic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remain at high risk despite surgical revascularization. While single arterial grafting (SAG) is standard in CABG, multi-arterial grafting (MAG) may offer better outcomes. However, its benefits in patients with reduced ejection fraction remain unclear. Aims: To evaluate whether MAG offers superior survival and clinical outcomes compared to SAG in patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central was conducted for studies comparing MAG and SAG in patients with LVEF <50%. Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival, cardiac death, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were MACE, perioperative MI, atrial fibrillation, reoperation, repeat revascularization, IABP use, stroke, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 19,976 patients were included (MAG: 10,306; SAG: 9,670). MAG was associated with significantly higher 5-year survival (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.32–1.70; p < 0.00001) and lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55–0.79; p < 0.00001), with a trend toward reduced cardiac death (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.50–1.12; p = 0.16). No significant differences were seen in MACE (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.49–1.04; p = 0.08), MI (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–1.06; p = 0.09), or repeat revascularization (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.23–1.68; p = 0.35). Reoperation was marginally lower with MAG (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.31–1.00; p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in stroke (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.92–1.65; p = 0.16), atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.55–1.56; p = 0.78), IABP use (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.49–1.15; p = 0.18), hospital stay (MD: 0.03; 95% CI: –0.64 to 0.70; p = 0.93), ICU stay (MD: 0.17; 95% CI: –0.30 to 0.63; p = 0.48), dialysis (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.61–1.38; p = 0.68), or sternal wound infection (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.83–2.94; p = 0.17). Conclusions: In patients with reduced LVEF undergoing CABG, MAG is associated with improved 5-year survival and lower in-hospital mortality without increased perioperative complications. These findings support broader consideration of MAG in this high-risk group.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
King Edward Medical University (PK), Khyber Medical College (PK), CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry (PK), Jinnah Sindh Medical University (PK), Urban Unit (PK), Dubai Medical College (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.