Abstract 4365037: Social Factors Associated with Pre-Pregnancy Care Utilization

Background: The American Heart Association recognizes the pre-pregnancy period as a window to optimize cardiovascular health and mitigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly in those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RF). However, disparities in access to and utilization of preventive care are well-established outside of pregnancy. Understanding the social factors associated with lower pre-pregnancy care can inform interventions to improve equity in maternal health. Methods: We used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a nationally representative survey of women with a recent live birth. We included women age ≥18 years with self-reported data on pre-pregnancy CVD RF (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or tobacco use) and visit attendance. The primary outcome was attendance at a clinic visit (i.e., “regular checkup”) with an OB/GYN or primary care doctor in the year prior to pregnancy. We calculated age-adjusted odds of attendance in those with 0, 1 or > 2 of the following adverse social factors: poor transportation access, food insecurity, unstable housing, lack of health insurance, difficulty paying bills, history of domestic abuse, and lack of a high school education. Next, we conducted subgroup analyses by presence of 0, 1 or > 2 CVD RF. Analyses were weighted accounting for survey design. Results: Of 233,815 women (weighted N=11,424,885), the mean age was 29.5 years, 32.6% had 1 CVD RF, and 10.2% had > 2 CVD RF. Adverse social factors were more often reported by those with CVD RF: 17.8% of those with no CVD RF, 25.7% with 1 CVD RF, and 28.3% with > 2 CVD RF (p=<0.01). Overall frequency of a pre-pregnancy clinic visit was 55.9% with a lower frequency in those with higher burden of adverse social factors ( TABLE ). For example, odds of a pre-pregnancy clinic visit was lower in those with > 2 compared with no adverse social factors in those with 0 CVD RF (63.8% VS 19.2%; aOR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.13-0.17), 1 CVD RF (60.3% VS 27.9%; aOR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.23-0.30), and > 2 CVD RF (60.9% VS 33.4%; aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.29-0.42). Conclusion: Adverse social factors are associated with a lower frequency of pre-pregnancy care utilization even among those with CVD RF. Among those with ≥2 adverse social factors, less than one-third of women attended a pre-pregnancy visit. Public health efforts should address upstream drivers of health to improve pre-pregnancy preventive care and optimize cardiovascular health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365037
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4365037: Social Factors Associated with Pre-Pregnancy Care Utilization

Natalie A. Cameron, Kartik K. Venkatesh, Ikeoluwapo Kendra Bolakale‐Rufai, Veronica Zheng et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4365037: Social Factors Associated with Pre-Pregnancy Care Utilization

Natalie A. Cameron, Kartik K. Venkatesh, Ikeoluwapo Kendra Bolakale‐Rufai, Veronica Zheng, Mariam Ardehali, Nicole D. Fields, Sadiya S. Khan
article en

Abstract

Background: The American Heart Association recognizes the pre-pregnancy period as a window to optimize cardiovascular health and mitigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly in those with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (RF). However, disparities in access to and utilization of preventive care are well-established outside of pregnancy. Understanding the social factors associated with lower pre-pregnancy care can inform interventions to improve equity in maternal health. Methods: We used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, a nationally representative survey of women with a recent live birth. We included women age ≥18 years with self-reported data on pre-pregnancy CVD RF (obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or tobacco use) and visit attendance. The primary outcome was attendance at a clinic visit (i.e., “regular checkup”) with an OB/GYN or primary care doctor in the year prior to pregnancy. We calculated age-adjusted odds of attendance in those with 0, 1 or > 2 of the following adverse social factors: poor transportation access, food insecurity, unstable housing, lack of health insurance, difficulty paying bills, history of domestic abuse, and lack of a high school education. Next, we conducted subgroup analyses by presence of 0, 1 or > 2 CVD RF. Analyses were weighted accounting for survey design. Results: Of 233,815 women (weighted N=11,424,885), the mean age was 29.5 years, 32.6% had 1 CVD RF, and 10.2% had > 2 CVD RF. Adverse social factors were more often reported by those with CVD RF: 17.8% of those with no CVD RF, 25.7% with 1 CVD RF, and 28.3% with > 2 CVD RF (p=<0.01). Overall frequency of a pre-pregnancy clinic visit was 55.9% with a lower frequency in those with higher burden of adverse social factors ( TABLE ). For example, odds of a pre-pregnancy clinic visit was lower in those with > 2 compared with no adverse social factors in those with 0 CVD RF (63.8% VS 19.2%; aOR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.13-0.17), 1 CVD RF (60.3% VS 27.9%; aOR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.23-0.30), and > 2 CVD RF (60.9% VS 33.4%; aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.29-0.42). Conclusion: Adverse social factors are associated with a lower frequency of pre-pregnancy care utilization even among those with CVD RF. Among those with ≥2 adverse social factors, less than one-third of women attended a pre-pregnancy visit. Public health efforts should address upstream drivers of health to improve pre-pregnancy preventive care and optimize cardiovascular health.

CirculationVol. 152(Suppl_3)
Northwestern University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.